Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Yangqianhui Zhang1, Rui Lin2, and Liang Zhao2This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

2School of Software Technology,Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116620, China


 

Received: September 26, 2023
Accepted: November 14, 2023
Publication Date: March 8, 2024

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202412_27(12).0015  


During the sintering process of iron ore, due to the long production line and multiple procedures, there is always a delay in control which can lead to defects on the sintering surface. To solve this problem, we propose a novel algorithm called TCUE that predicts these defects based on time compensation mechanism. The algorithm exploits various decision tree algorithms to calculate feature importance, which helps it determine the optimal time lag for each feature and compensate for any delays accordingly. Furthermore, UMAP is used for dimensionality reduction to simplify the calculation. Finally, we employ a kernel extreme learning machine for classification. Our experimental results have shown that TCUE can accurately predict whether cracks will appear on the sintering surface. It outperforms other common machine learning methods, making it suitable for large-scale deployment in factories.


Keywords: Cracks Prediction; Machine Learning; Sintering; Time Lag


  1. [1] M. S. Hossain, S. Rahaman, A.-L. Kor, K. Andersson, and C. Pattinson, (2017) “A belief rule based expert system for datacenter PUE prediction under uncertainty" IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing 2(2): 140–153. DOI: 10.1109/TSUSC.2017.2697768.
  2. [2] Z. Cheng, J. Yang, L. Zhou, Y. Liu, and Q. Wang, (2016) “Sinter strength evaluation using process parameters under different conditions in iron ore sintering process" Applied Thermal Engineering 105: 894–904. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.034.
  3. [3] J. Hu, M. Wu, X. Chen, S. Du, P. Zhang, W. Cao, and J. She, (2018) “A multilevel prediction model of carbon efficiency based on the differential evolution algorithm for the iron ore sintering process" IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 65(11): 8778–8787. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2811371.
  4. [4] S. Patil, A. Jalan, and A. Marathe, (2022) “Support vector machine for misalignment fault classification under different loading conditions using vibro-acoustic sensor data fusion" Experimental Techniques: 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s40799-021-00533-6.
  5. [5] L. Song, L. Qing, L. Xiaojie, and S. Yanqin, (2020) “Synthetically predicting the quality index of sinter using machine learning model" Ironmaking & Steelmaking 47(7): 828–836. DOI: 10.1080/03019233.2019.1617573.
  6. [6] S. Mohanan, P. Mohapatra, A. Kumar, R. K. Adepu, V. M. Koranne, Y. Prasad, A. Reddy, and R. Ramna, (2021) “Prediction and Optimization of Internal Return Fines Generation in Iron Ore Sintering Using Machine Learning" Advances in Materials 10(3): 42. DOI: 10.11648/j.am.20211003.12.
  7. [7] Q. Shan, Q. Ma, Y. Xue, and A. Shui, “The damage mode automatic identification of Al2TiO5 flexible ceramics based on machine learning" Advanced Engineering Materials: DOI: 10.1002/adem.202201642.
  8. [8] T. Kamal and A. Upadhyaya, (2022) “Machine Learning Based Sintered Density Prediction of Bronze Processed by Powder Metallurgy Route" Metals and Materials International: 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s12540-022-01338-x.
  9. [9] A. Mallick, S. Dhara, and S. Rath, (2021) “Application of machine learning algorithms for prediction of sinter machine productivity" Machine Learning with Applications 6: 100186. DOI: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100186.
  10. [10] H. Zhou, H. Zhang, and C. Yang, (2019) “Hybridmodel-based intelligent optimization of ironmaking process" IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 67(3): 2469–2479. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2903770.
  11. [11] L. Feng, C. Zhao, and Y. Sun, (2020) “Dual attention-based encoder–decoder: A customized sequenceto-sequence learning for soft sensor development" IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32(8): 3306–3317. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3015929.
  12. [12] F. Yan, X. Zhang, C. Yang, B. Hu, W. Qian, and Z. Song, (2023) “Data-driven modelling methods in sintering process: Current research status and perspectives" The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 101(8): 4506–4522. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.24790.
  13. [13] X. Bai, C. Chen, W. Liu, and H. Zhang. “Data-driven prediction of sinter composition based on multisource information and LSTM network”. In: 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE. 2021, 3311–3316. DOI: 10.23919/CCC52363.2021.9549500.
  14. [14] P. Zhou, B. Gao, C. Zhao, and T. Chai, (2023) “Heterogeneous data-driven measurement method for FeO content of sinter based on deep learning and tensor decomposition" Control Engineering Practice 134: 105479. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2023.105479.
  15. [15] Q. Gao, H. Wang, X. Pan, X. Jiang, H. Zheng, and F. Shen, (2021) “A forecast model of the sinter tumble strength in iron ore fines sintering process" Powder Technology 390: 256–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.063.
  16. [16] Y. Q. Ying, J. G. Lu, J. S. Chen, and Y. X. Sun, (2012) “PIDNN based intelligent control of ignition oven" Advanced Materials Research 396: 493–497.
  17. [17] J. An, C. Yang, M. Wu, and S. Du, (2023) “Intelligent Control Strategy for Sintering Ignition Temperature Based on Working-Condition Recognition" IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering: DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3296475.
  18. [18] K. Zhou, X. Chen, M. Wu, W. Cao, and J. Hu, (2019) “A new hybrid modeling and optimization algorithm for improving carbon efficiency based on different time scales in sintering process" Control Engineering Practice 91: 104104. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104104.
  19. [19] W. Cao, Y. Zhang, J. She, M. Wu, and Y. Cao, (2018) “A dynamic subspace model for predicting burn-through point in iron sintering process" Information Sciences 466: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.069.
  20. [20] S. Du, M. Wu, L. Chen, K. Zhou, J. Hu, W. Cao, and W. Pedrycz, (2019) “A fuzzy control strategy of burnthrough point based on the feature extraction of time-series trend for iron ore sintering process" IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 16(4): 2357–2368. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2935030.
  21. [21] F. Yan, C. Yang, and X. Zhang, (2022) “DSTED: A denoising spatial–temporal encoder–decoder framework for multistep prediction of burn-through point in sintering process" IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 69(10): 10735–10744. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3151960.
  22. [22] F. Yan, C. Yang, X. Zhang, and L. Gao, (2023) “A 3D Convolution-Based Burn-Through Point Multi-Step Prediction Model for Sintering Process" IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics: DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2023.3279576.
  23. [23] Y. Xie, B. He, X. Zhang, and Z. Song. “A Decomposition-based Encoder-Decoder Framework for Multi-step Prediction of Burn-Through Point in Sintering Process”. In: 2023 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS). IEEE. 2023, 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICPS58381.2023.10128029.
  24. [24] L. McInnes, J. Healy, and J. Melville, (2018) “Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction" arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426: DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426.
  25. [25] A. Akusok, K.-M. Björk, Y. Miche, and A. Lendasse, (2015) “High-performance extreme learning machines: a complete toolbox for big data applications" IEEE Access 3: 1011–1025. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2450498.