Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Yun Zeng1, Jie Zhang1, Rui Xie This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.2, Ting Zheng1, Hui Dong3, Xiaobo Liu4, and Xiaohua Chen5

1School of Mechatronic Engineering, Oil and Gas Equipment Technology Sharing and Service Platform of Sichuan Province, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
2Dazhou Industrial Technology Institute of Intelligent Manufacturing, Dazhou 635000, China
3Sichuan Vocational College of Information Technology, Intelligent Control Academy, guangyuan 628040, China
4Kunming Oil and Gas Transmission Branch of Southwest Pipeline Company, National Pipe Network Group, Kunming 650000, China
5National Pipe Network Group Southwest Pipeline Co., Ltd., Chenqdu 610094, China


 

Received: August 20, 2022
Accepted: December 12, 2022
Publication Date: March 9, 2023

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202311_26(11).0003  


ABSTRACT


Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam is a light and deformable geosynthetic that can reduce the pressure on the pipe by surrounding soil. The protective effect of geofoam bocks protection on the buried pipe under stratum settlement was investigated. The effect of settlement displacement, diameter-thickness ratio, internal pressure, surrounding soil, and EPS thickness on the axial strain and ovalisation of pipe were analyzed. The results show that the axial strain and ovalisation of pipe protected with EPS are smaller than that in soil. With the increase of the pipe diameter-thickness ratio, the axial strain and ovalisation of pipe with or without protection increase. With the increase of internal pressure, the buckling mode of pipe buried in soil changes from collapse to wrinkle gradually, but the ovalisation changes of pipe protected with EPS is small. When the surrounding soil is rock, buckling occurred in the without protection is more obvious. The safety of the pipeline is better with thicker EPS.


Keywords: Geofoam, buried pipe, settlement area, numerical method, buckling


REFERENCES


  1. [1] C. Lin, M. Huang, F. Nadim, and Z. Liu, (2020) “Tunnelling-induced response of buried pipelines and their effects on ground settlements" Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 96: DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103193.
  2. [2] S. Bartlett, B. Lingwall, and J. Vaslestad, (2015) “Methods of protecting buried pipelines and culverts in transportation infrastructure using EPS geofoam" Geotextiles and Geomembranes 43(5): 450–461. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.019.
  3. [3] A. Mohajerani, M. Ashdown, L. Abdihashi, and M. Nazem, (2017) “Expanded polystyrene geofoam in pavement construction" Construction and Building Materials 157: 438–448. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.113.
  4. [4] S. AbdelSalam, R. Jama, and M. Salah, (2019) “EPS inclusion to reduce vertical stresses on shallow tunnels" Geosynthetics International 26(2): 121–135. DOI: 10.1680/jgein.18.00042.
  5. [5] A. Puppala, P. Ruttanaporamakul, and S. Congress, (2019) “Design and construction of lightweight EPS geofoam embedded geomaterial embankment system for control of settlements" Geotextiles and Geomembranes 47(3): 295–305. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.015.
  6. [6] S. Siabil, S. Tafreshi, and A. Dawson, (2020) “Response of pavement foundations incorporating both geocells and expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam" Geotextiles and Geomembranes 48(1): 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103499.
  7. [7] Y. Choo, T. Abdoun, M. O’Rourke, and D. Ha, (2007) “Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation" Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27(12): 1043–1055. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.002.
  8. [8] A. Witthoeft and H. Kim, (2016) “Numerical investigation of earth pressure reduction on buried pipes using EPS geofoam compressible inclusions" Geosynthetics International 23(4): 287–300. DOI: 10.1680/jgein.15.00054.
  9. [9] M. Meguid, M. Hussein, M. Ahmed, Z. Omeman, and J. Whalen, (2017) “Investigation of soil-geosynthetic structure interaction associated with induced trench installation" Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45(4): 320–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.004.
  10. [10] S. Bartlett and B. Lingwall. “Protection of pipelines and buried structures using EPS geofoam”. In: 238 GSP. cited By 8. 2014, 547–556. DOI: 10.1061/9780784413401.054.
  11. [11] P. Vazouras, S. Karamanos, and P. Dakoulas, (2010) “Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements" Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30(11): 1361–1376. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011.
  12. [12] X. Zhao, (2015) “Deformation and stress analysis of buried pipeline crossing mining subsidence area and remote monitoring" Chinese.] MS thesis, College of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ:
  13. [13] M. Meguid and M. Hussein, (2017) “A Numerical Procedure for the Assessment of Contact Pressures on Buried Structures Overlain by EPS Geofoam Inclusion" International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 3(1): DOI: 10.1007/s40891-016-0078-y.
  14. [14] H. Rasouli and B. Fatahi, (2020) “Geofoam blocks to protect buried pipelines subjected to strike-slip fault rupture" Geotextiles and Geomembranes 48(3): 257–274. DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.011.
  15. [15] P. Xu, (2015) “Study on the buried pipeline-soil interaction and its mechanical response by mining subsidence" China University of Mining and Technology:
  16. [16] J. Zhang, Z. Liang, and C. Han, (2014) “Buckling behavior analysis of buried gas pipeline under strike-slip fault displacement" Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 21: 921–928. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.028.
  17. [17] P. Vazouras, S. Karamanos, and P. Dakoulas, (2012) “Mechanical behavior of buried steel pipes crossing active strike-slip faults" Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 41: 164–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.012.
  18. [18] A. Gresnigt, (1986) “Plastic design of buried steel pipelines in settlement areas" Heron (Delft) 31(4): 1–113.
  19. [19] American National Standards Institute. Pipeline transportation systems for liquid hydrocarbons and other liquids. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019.
  20. [20] L. Wu, (2015) “A study on buried pipeline of limiting suspended length" MS thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Xian Petroleum Univ:


    



 

1.6
2022CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.