Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Alaa K. Al-azzawiThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and Basil M. Al-mahdawi

Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research, Middle Technical University, Technical Engineering College, Department of Mechatronics Eng. Techniques, Baghdad-Iraq


 

Received: June 28, 2022
Accepted: August 5, 2022
Publication Date: October 14, 2022

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202307_26(7).0011  


ABSTRACT


Nowadays, the modern internet has adopted all the uses of the IoT in addition to 3D technologies. The exchange of information on the internet takes place in the form of packets that are almost supported by a finite throughput. A large number of transferred packets must flow smoothly and be controlled to avoid congestion. Therefore, the trend lies in adopting smart algorithms to control the flow of data, which will increase the efficiency of traffic management while preventing the occurrence of congestion. Congestion problems and transmission packet losses may greatly reduce communication activities. In this paper, a rate-based congestion control framework for managing TCP applications as well as monitoring data traffic in wireless network-based sensors was presented. Further, optimal management dedicated to internet bearers is also suggested. The contributions of this paper have included an analytical comparison with the following congestion control algorithms; HSTCP, STCP, and CUBIC-TCP. This is to optimize the use of the available bandwidth as well as to control the flow of data in a smoothly. In addition, an intentional sequential queuing delay was adopted as feedback control modeling to be a challenge in increasing the number of users in the network. Finally, simulation sketches between the blocking probability versus no. of channels with an increase in no. of users, users in a queue, channels, CRR, and HTG, were distinct and stable to a large extent. The sketches also showed a noticeable change in the characteristics of data traffic: more data traffic and less transmission time.


Keywords: Network traffic, Packet, Routers, Congestion control, wireless-link scheduling


REFERENCES


  1. [1] A. K. Al-Azzawi, M. I. Saripan, A. Jantan, and R.W. O. Rahmat, (2010) “A review of wave-net identical learning & filling-in in a decomposition space of (JPGJPEG) sampled images" Artificial Intelligence Review 34(4): 309–342.
  2. [2] D.-B. Nguyen, C.-R. Dow, and S.-F. Hwang, (2018) “An efficient traffic congestion monitoring system on internet of vehicles" Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2018: DOI: 10.1155/2018/9136813.
  3. [3] F. Kelly, (2003) “Fairness and stability of end-to-end congestion control" European journal of control 9(2-3): 159–176. DOI: 10.3166/ejc.9.159-176.
  4. [4] F. Paganini, Z. Wang, S. H. Low, and J. C. Doyle. “A new TCP/AQM for stable operation in fast networks”. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37428). 1. IEEE. 2003, 96–105.
  5. [5] W. Zhang, G. Tan, N. Ding, and G.Wang, (2012) “Traffic congestion evaluation and signal control optimization based on wireless sensor networks: model and algorithms" Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012: DOI: 10.1155/2012/573171.
  6. [6] R. Johari and D. K. H. Tan, (2001) “End-to-end congestion control for the Internet: Delays and stability" IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking 9(6): 818–832. DOI: 10.1109/90.974534.
  7. [7] S. Ahmad and M. J. Arshad, (2019) “Enhancing fast TCP’s performance using single TCP connection for parallel traffic flows to prevent head-of-line blocking" IEEE Access 7: 148152–148162. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946527.
  8. [8] H. Huang, Z. Sun, and X.Wang, (2020) “End-to-End TCP Congestion Control for Mobile Applications" IEEE Access 8: 171628–171642. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024707.
  9. [9] P. Dong, K. Gao, J. Xie,W. Tang, N. Xiong, and A. V. Vasilakos, (2019) “Receiver-side TCP countermeasure in cellular networks" Sensors 19(12): 2791. DOI: 10.3390/s19122791.
  10. [10] S. Manjunath and G. Raina, (2018) “Stability and performance of compound TCP with a proportional integral queue policy" IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 27(5): 2139–2155. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2855141.
  11. [11] C. A. Grazia, N. Patriciello, M. Klapez, and M. Casoni. “Bbr+: improving tcp bbr performance over wlan”. In: ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE. 2020, 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149220.
  12. [12] S. Ahmad and M. J. Arshad, (2019) “Enhancing fast TCP’s performance using single TCP connection for parallel traffic flows to prevent head-of-line blocking" IEEE Access 7: 148152–148162. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946527.
  13. [13] D. X. Wei, C. Jin, S. H. Low, and S. Hegde, (2006) “FAST TCP: motivation, architecture, algorithms, performance" IEEE/ACM transactions on Networking 14(6): 1246–1259. DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2006.886335.
  14. [14] R.M. Murray, K. J. Astrom, S. P. Boyd, R.W. Brockett, and G. Stein, (2003) “Future directions in control in an information-rich world" IEEE control systems magazine 23(2): 20–33. DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2003.1188769.
  15. [15] A. Faro, D. Giordano, and C. Spampinato, (2011) “Integrating location tracking, traffic monitoring and semantics in a layered ITS architecture" IET intelligent transport systems 5(3): 197–206. DOI: 10.1049/ietits.2010.0141.
  16. [16] J. Van Lint, A. Valkenberg, A. Van Binsbergen, and A. Bigazzi, (2010) “Advanced traffic monitoring for sustainable traffic management: experiences and results of five years of collaborative research in the Netherlands" IET Intelligent Transport Systems 4(4): 387–400. DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2009.0109.
  17. [17] S. Biaz and N. H. Vaidya, (2005) “" De-randomizing" congestion losses to improve TCP performance over wiredwireless networks" IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking 13(3): 596–608. DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2005.850205.
  18. [18] S. Manjunath and G. Raina, (2018) “Stability and performance of compound TCP with a proportional integral queue policy" IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 27(5): 2139–2155. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2855141.
  19. [19] J. Qiu, Z. Tian, C. Du, Q. Zuo, S. Su, and B. Fang, (2020) “A survey on access control in the age of internet of things" IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7(6): 4682–4696. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2969326.
  20. [20] M. Shafiq, Z. Tian, A. K. Bashir, X. Du, and M. Guizani, (2020) “CorrAUC: a malicious bot-IoT traffic detection method in IoT network using machine-learning techniques" IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8(5): 3242–3254. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3002255.
  21. [21] Z. Tian, X. Gao, S. Su, and J. Qiu, (2019) “Vcash: a novel reputation framework for identifying denial of traffic service in internet of connected vehicles" IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7(5): 3901–3909. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2951620.
  22. [22] J.Wang, J.Wen, Y. Han, J. Zhang, C. Li, and Z. Xiong, (2013) “CUBIC-FIT: A high performance and TCP CUBIC friendly congestion control algorithm" IEEE Communications Letters 17(8): 1664–1667. DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2013.060513.130664.
  23. [23] H. ElAarag and M. Wozniak. “Using fuzzy inference to improve TCP congestion control over wireless networks.” In: SpringSim (CNS). 2012, 16.
  24. [24] S. Floyd and K. Fall, (1999) “Promoting the use of endto-end congestion control in the Internet" IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking 7(4): 458–472. DOI: 10.1109/90.793002.
  25. [25] P. Lassila, J. Karvo, and J. Virtamo. “Efficient importance sampling for Monte Carlo simulation of multicast networks”. In: Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No. 01CH37213). 1. IEEE. 2001, 432–439.