Siow Chen Sian This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 and Darmesah Gabda1

1Department of Mathematics with Economics, Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


 

Received: December 7, 2020
Accepted: March 8, 2021
Publication Date: October 11, 2021

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202206_25(3).0007  


ABSTRACT


When the extreme data were obtained from several sites in a region, spatial extreme analysis is always been considered. In this paper, we model the annual maximum rainfall data by using generalized extreme value distribution. We fit the model independently for each site to prevent extreme value complex modeling. However, it also cause the statistical assumption of dependency between sites been violated. Therefore, we applied the sandwich estimator to correct the variance of the model. We also consider an analysis of small sample sizes of the observed data. The method of penalized maximum likelihood estimation was carried out to improve the inference of the model. In the end, the return levels of the annual maximum rainfall data were computed by using the corrected model.


Keywords: Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution, Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation (PMLE), Sandwich Estimator, Return Level


REFERENCES


  1. [1] S. Yoon, B. Kumphon, and J. S. Park, (2015) “Spatial modeling of extreme rainfall in northeast Thailand" Journal of Applied Statistics 42(8): 1813–1828. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1010492.
  2. [2] J. Tawn, R. Shooter, R. Towe, and R. Lamb, (2018) “Modelling spatial extreme events with environmental applications" Spatial Statistics 28: 39–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2018.04.007.
  3. [3] J. Blanchet and A. C. Davison, (2011) “Spatial modeling of extreme snow depth" Annals of Applied Statistics 5(3): 1699–1725. DOI: 10.1214/11-AOAS464.
  4. [4] S. Coles and M. Dixon, (2000) “Likelihood-Based Inference for Extreme Value Models" Extremes 2(1): 5–23. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009905222644.
  5. [5] D. Gabd and J. Tawn. “Inference for an extreme value model accounting for inter-site dependence”. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 1830. American Institute of Physics Inc., 2017, 70035. DOI: 10.1063/1.4980985.
  6. [6] N. F. Musakkal and D. Gabda. “The sandwich estimator approach counting for inter-site dependence of extreme river flow in Sabah”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 890. 1. Institute of Physics Publishing, 2017, 12148. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012148.
  7. [7] N. F. Kahal Musakkal, S. N. Chin, K. Ghazali, and D. Gabda, (2017) “A penalized likelihood approach to model the annual maximum flow with small sample sizes" Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 13(4): 563–566. DOI: 10.11113/mjfas.v0n0.620.
  8. [8] J. E. Morrison and J. A. Smith, (2002) “Stochastic modeling of flood peaks using the generalized extreme value distribution"Water Resources Research 38(12): 41–1–41–12. DOI: 10.1029/2001wr000502.
  9. [9] E. S. Martins and J. R. Stedinger, (2000) “Generalized maximum-likelihood generalized extreme-value quantile estimators for hydrologic data" Water Resources Research 36(3): 737–744. DOI: 10.1029/1999WR900330.
  10. [10] J. R. Hosking, J. R. Wallis, and E. F. Wood, (1985) “Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments" Technometrics 27(3): 251–261. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1985.10488049.


    
 

0.7
2020CiteScore
 
 
33rd percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.