Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Arlina Bunga Saputri1This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Beny Harjadi2, Agus Wuryanta3, Sapto Nugroho4, Edy Junaidi3, Sigit Andy Cahyono5, Bambang Tejo Premono5, Tugas Tri Wahyono6, Firda Maftukhakh Hilmya Nada5, and Dian Pratiwi5

1Disaster Research Center, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

2Research Center for Geological Disaster, National Research and Innovation Agency (NRIA), Indonesia

3Research Center for Limnology and Water Resources, National Research and Innovation Agency (NRIA), Indonesia

4Research Center for Hydrodinamics Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (NRIA), Indonesia

5Research Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology, National Research and Innovation Agency (NRIA), Indonesia

6Research Center for Literary Manuscript and Oral Traditions, National Research and Innovation Agency (NRIA), Indonesia


 

 

Received: October 8, 2024
Accepted: December 21, 2024
Publication Date: February 28, 2025

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202511_28(11).0002  


The advancement of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology through 3D modeling has significantly improved disaster risk analysis, particularly for landslides. This study utilized Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Agisoft Metashape software to produce accurate 3D models, which were used to identify the location, volume, displacement, and distribution of landslide impacts in Tawangmangu Sub-district, Karanganyar Regency. This area is characterized by hilly topography with slopes > 45% and frequent land-use changes that exacerbate landslide risks. The 3D modeling process involved several key steps: aerial image acquisition using UAVs at an altitude of 126 meters, photo processing with Agisoft Metashape to generate orthomosaic maps, Digital Elevation Models (DEM), and geospatial analysis. Camera calibration was performed to enhance accuracy, while risk analyze using overlay and scoring methods were applied to hazard, vulnerability, and community capacity parameters in accordance with National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) Regulation No. 02 of 2012. The results revealed that most of Tawangmangu Sub-district falls into the medium-risk category for landslides, covering an area of 4023.45 hectares, with the highest risk levels identified in Sepanjang and Tawangmangu villages. The 3D models indicated translational landslides, with soil displacement volumes ranging from −5409.3 m3 to −991,808 m3, causing infrastructure damage and road closures. Mitigation efforts integrated UAV technology for realtime monitoring and indigenous knowledge in the form of coping strategies passed down through generations. UAV data was also utilized for disaster simulation, community training, and evidence-based mitigation planning, such as designing retaining walls and evacuation routes. This study highlights the importance of combining UAV technology and indigenous knowledge to enhance community capacity for sustainable and independent disaster risk reduction in landslide-prone areas.

 


Keywords: Landslide, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Indigenous Knowledge, 3 Dimension, Mitigation.


  1. [1] K.Altemus Cullen, (2023) “A review of applications of remote sensing for drought studies in the Andes region" J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 49: 101483. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101483.
  2. [2] O. Higuera Roa, D. Cotti, N. Aste, A. Bustillos Ardaya, S. Schneiderbauer, I. Tourino Soto, F. Román Dañobeytia, and Y. Walz, (2023) “Deriving targeted intervention packages of nature-based solutions for cli mate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: A geospatial multi-criteria approach for building resilience in the Puna region, Peru" Nature-Based Solutions 4: 100090. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100090.
  3. [3] Y. Li, M. Henrion, A. Moore, S. Lambot, S. Opfer gelt, V. Vanacker, F. Jonard, and K. Van Oost, (2024) “Factors controlling peat soil thickness and carbon storage in temperate peatlands based on UAV high-resolution re mote sensing" Geoderma 449: 117009. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117009.
  4. [4] S. Liu, X. Jin, Y. Bai, W. Wu, N. Cui, M. Cheng, Y. Liu, L. Meng, X. Jia, C. Nie, and D. Yin, (2023) “UAV multispectral images for accurate estimation of the maize LAIconsidering the effect of soil background" Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 121: 103383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103383.
  5. [5] T. J. Douglas, N. C. Coops, and M. C. Drever, (2023) “UAV-acquired imagery with photogrammetry provides accurate measures of mudflat elevation gradients and mi crotopography for investigating microphytobenthos pat terning" Science of Remote Sensing 7: 100089. DOI: 10.1016/j.srs.2023.100089.
  6. [6] P. Boitard, B. Coudert, N. Lauret, S. Queguiner, C. Marais-Sicre, O. Regaieg, Y. Wang, and J.-P. Gastellu Etchegorry, (2023) “Calibration of DART 3D model with UAVandSentinel-2 for studying the radiative budget of conventional and agro-ecological maize fields" Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 32: 101079. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101079.
  7. [7] T. Beni, L. Nava, G. Gigli, W. Frodella, F. Catani, N. Casagli, J. I. Gallego, C. Margottini, and D. Spizzichino, (2023) “Classification of rock slope cav ernous weathering on UAVphotogrammetricpointclouds: The example of Hegra (UNESCO World Heritage Site, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)" Eng. Geol. 325: 107286. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107286.
  8. [8] D.Beltrán-Marcos,S.Suárez-Seoane,J.M.Fernández Guisuraga, V. Fernández-García, E. Marcos, and L. Calvo, (2023) “Relevance of UAV and sentinel-2 data fu sion for estimating topsoil organic carbon after forest fire" Geoderma 430: 116290. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116290.
  9. [9] M. La Salandra, S. Nicotri, G. Donvito, A. Italiano, R. Colacicco, G. Miniello, I. Lapietra, R. Roseto, P. Dellino, and D. Capolongo, (2024) “A paradigm shift in processing large UAV image datasets for emergency managementofnatural hazards" Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 132: 103996. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2024.103996.
  10. [10] G. Cremen, C. Galasso, J. McCloskey, A. Barcena, M. Creed, M. E. Filippi, R. Gentile, L. T. Jenkins, M. Kalaycioglu, E. Y. Mentese, M. Muthusamy, K. Tarbali, and R. Š. Trogrli´c, (2023) “A state-of-the-art decision-support environment for risk-sensitive and pro poor urban planning and design in Tomorrow’s cities" Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 85: 103400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103400.
  11. [11] A. C. Y. Bray, C. H. R. Orchiston, and S. R. Shrestha, (2023) “Using photovoice for disaster and hazard prepared ness: A methodological review" Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 93: 103742. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103742.
  12. [12] T. Stanley, (2024) “Carbon ‘known not grown’: Reforest ing Scotland, advanced measurement technologies, and a new frontier of mitigation deterrence" Environ. Sci. Pol icy 151: 103636. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103636.
  13. [13] M. A. Azizi, I. M. Marwanza, and N. A. Hartanti, (2019) “Penentuan Volume Potensi Longsoran Lereng Tambang Terbuka Menggunakan Metode Kesetimbangan Batas 3 Dimensi" prosiding profesi per 1: 173–184. DOI: 10.36986/ptptp.v0i0.18.
  14. [14] L. Ronggowulan, S. Nugraha, Y. A. Wibowo, H. D. Saputro, and K. S. Hapsari, (2024) “Knowledge of dis aster safe education at landslide-prone schools in Tawang mangu, Indonesia" IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1314: 012021. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1314/1/012021.
  15. [15] N.Ya’acob, A. A. A. Rahman, A. L. Yusof, D. M. Ali, and N. F. Naim, (2024) “Landslide detection using anal ysed UAV imagery" Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 45: 168–188. DOI: 10.37934/araset.45.1.168188.
  16. [16] A. Hermawan, B. Guntoro, and M. Sulhan, (2024) “Community engagement for disaster preparedness in ru ral areas of mount merapi, Indonesia" Int. J. Sustain able Dev. Plann. 19: 1505–1518. DOI: 10.18280/ijsdp.190427.
  17. [17] Y. Panara, N. Menegoni, T. Finkbeiner, R. Zühlke, and V. Vahrenkamp, (2024) “High-resolution analysis of 3D fracture networks from Digital Outcrop Models, correlation to plate-tectonic events and calibration of sub surface models (Jurassic, Arabian Plate)" Mar. Pet. Geol. 167: 106998. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.106998.
  18. [18] M. A. Saputra, M. L. Rayes, and I. Nita, (2019) “Pemetaan Prediksi Sebaran Kerentanan Longsor Di Ke camatan Tawangmangu, Kabupaten Karanganyar Meng gunakan Pendekatan Fuzzy Logic" Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan 6: 1353–1359. DOI: 10.21776/ub.jtsl.2019.006.2.16.
  19. [19] L. Hu, A. Takahashi, j. =. " Kasama Kiyonobu", and FOUND., (2022) “Effect of spatial variability on stability and failure mechanisms of 3D slope using random limit equilibrium method" 62: 101225. DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101225.
  20. [20] S. Nugraha, R. Utomowati, A. E. Saputra, and A. B. Saputri, (2024) “Landslide risk reduction for sustainable land use direction in Tawangmangu District, Karangan yar Regency year 2023" IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1314: 012026. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1314/1/012026.
  21. [21] Z. Feng, Z. Cheng, L. Ren, B. Liu, C. Zhang, D. Zhao, H. Sun, H. Feng, H. Long, B. Xu, H. Yang, X. Song, X. Ma, G. Yang, and C. Zhao, (2024) “Real-time monitor ing of maize phenology with the VI-RGS composite index using time-series UAV remote sensing images and meteo rological data" Comput. Electron. Agric. 224: 109212. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109212.
  22. [22] O.G.AjayiandJ.Ajulo,(2021) “Investigating the appli cability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) photogramme try for the estimation of the volume of stockpiles" Quaest. Geogr. 40: 25–38. DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2021-0002.
  23. [23] D. R. Abeho, M. Shoko, and P. A. Odera, (2024) “Ef fects of camera calibration on the accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle sensor products" Int. J. Eng. Geosci. 9: DOI: 10.26833/ijeg.1422619.
  24. [24] S. A. H. Mohsan, N. Q. H. Othman, Y. Li, M. H. Al sharif, and M. A. Khan, (2023) “Unmanned aerial ve hicles (UAVs): practical aspects, applications, open chal lenges, security issues, and future trends" Intell. Serv. Robot. 16: 109–137. DOI: 10.1007/s11370-022-00452 4.
  25. [25] M. A. Al-Shareeda, M. A. Saare, and S. Manickam, (2023) “Unmanned aerial vehicle: a review and future directions" Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 30: 778. DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v30.i2.pp778-786.
  26. [26] E. Cledat, D. A. Cucci, and J. Skaloud, (2020) “Cam era calibration models and methods for corridor mapping with UAVs" ISPRSAnn.Photogramm.RemoteSens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 5: 231–238. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annalsV-1-2020-231-2020.
  27. [27] F. Yao, C. Lan, L. Wang, H. Wan, T. Gao, and Z. Wei, (2024) “GNSS-denied geolocalization of UAVs using terrain-weighted constraint optimization" Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 135: 104277. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2024.104277.
  28. [28] K.-C. Liao, J.-L. Liou, M. Hidayat, H.-T. Wen, and H.-Y. Wu, (2024) “Detection and analysis of aircraft com posite material structures using UAV" Inventions 9: 47. DOI: 10.3390/inventions9030047.
  29. [29] K.-C. Liao, J. Lau, and M. Hidayat, (2024) “Aircraft skin damage visual testing system using lightweight de vices with YOLO: An automated real-time material evalu ation system" AI (Basel) 5: 1793–1815. DOI: 10.3390/ai5040089.
  30. [30] J. Kedys, I. Tchappi, and A. Najjar, (2024) “UAVs for disaster management- an exploratory review" Procedia Comput. Sci. 231: 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.184.


    



 

2.1
2023CiteScore
 
 
69th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.