Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Chi-Hyuck JunThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 1, S. Balamurali1 and M. Kalyanasundaram2

1Division of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790 784, South Korea
2School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639 798


 

Received: June 27, 2005
Accepted: November 23, 2005
Publication Date: December 1, 2006

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2006.9.4.13  


ABSTRACT


Dodge (1943) introduced a single level attribute continuous sampling plan designated as CSP-1 for the application of continuous production processes. Lieberman and Solomon (1955) developed multi-level (MLP) continuous sampling plans. In this paper, we restrict our discussion to MLP plans with two sampling levels, which plan is designated as MLP-2 plan. Using a Markov chain model, expressions for the performance measures of MLP-2 plan are derived. Tables are also presented for the selection of MLP-2 plan when the AQL or LQL and AOQL are specified.


Keywords: Average Number Inspected, Average Outgoing Quality, Markov Chain


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Dodge, H. F., “A Sampling Inspection Plan for Continuous Production,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 14, pp.264279 (1943).
  2. [2] Dodge, H. F. and Torrey, M. N., “Additional Continuous Sampling Inspection Plans,” Industrial Quality Control, Vol. 7, pp. 712 (1951).
  3. [3] Karlin, S., A First Course in Stochastic Processes, New York Academic Press (1966).
  4. [4] Lasater, H. A., “On the Robustness of a Class of Continuous Sampling Plans Under Certain Types of Process Models,” Ph.D Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (1970).
  5. [5] Lieberman, G. J. and Solomon, H., “Multi-Level Continuous Sampling Plans,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 26, pp.686704 (1955).
  6. [6] Roberts, S. W., “States of Markov Chains for Evaluating Continuous Sampling Plans,” Transactions of the 17 Annual All Day Conference on Quality Control, Metropolitan Section ASQC and /Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 106111 (1965).
  7. [7] Ross, S. M., Stochastic Processes, 2nd Ed., New York, Wiley (1996).
  8. [8] Stephens, K. S., “How to Perform Continuous Sampling (CSP),” Vol. 2, ASQC Basic References in Quality Control, Statistical Techniques, American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, WI (1979).