Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Steven I-Jy Chien This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1

1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ 07102-1982, U.S.A. 


 

Received: August 28, 2001
Accepted: October 9, 2001
Publication Date: December 1, 2001

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2001.4.4.06  


ABSTRACT


This paper describes the evaluation approach that will be used to assess the performance of the Ramp Metering Control (RMC) for the New Jersey Department of Transportation in the United States. The primary objectives of the evaluation are to assess the impact of RMC control strategies on traffic flow and support the analysis of critical operational procedures. The framework for the evaluation consists of identifying a set metering control strategies and performance measures that will test the robustness of the RMC. The metering control strategies are designed to capture dynamic traffic conditions that might occur on the Interstate Freeway I-80 in New Jersey. The primary evaluation tool is a micro-simulation model (CORSIM) that has been developed to integrate the metering control strategies.


Keywords: Traffic Control, Freeway, Ramp, Simulation, CORSIM


REFERENCES


  1. [1] California Department of Transportation, The Effects of Ramp Metering on City Streets, (1979).
  2. [2] Chien, S. and Chowdhury, S., “Freeway Capacity Analysis with Microscopic Simulation Models (CORSIM)” Project Report - Phase II, Research and Development Division, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA-USDOT (1998).
  3. [3] Chien, S. , “Strategies for Traffic Control on Freeways”, Sigma Xi, NJIT Chapter and IEEE - North Jersey Chapter, Newark, New Jersey, U. S. A. (1998).
  4. [4] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), CORSIM User’s Manual. Contract No. DTFH61 -92-Z-00074, Washington, D. C., U. S. A. (1996).
  5. [5] Kang, S. and Gillen D., Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Ramp Meters. California PATH Research Report, UCB-ITS-PRR-99-19, ISSN 1055-1425 (1999).
  6. [6] Masher, D. P., Ross, D., Wong, W. P., Tuan, J. P., Zeidler, H. M. and Petracek, S., Guidelines for Design and Operation of Ramp Control Systems, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Contract NCHRP, pp. 3-22 (1975).
  7. [7] MN/DOT, Freeway Operations Program Status Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation, (1994).
  8. [8] Piotrowicz, G. and Robinson, J., Ramp Metering Status in North America. FHWA DOT-T-95-17 (1995).
  9. [9] U. S. DOT, Federal Highway Administration, Coordinated Operation of Ramp Metering and Adjacent Traffic Signal Control Systems, Publication No. FHWA-RD-95-130 (1996).
  10. [10] Wattleworth, J. A., Peak-Period Analysis and Control of a Freeway System, Highway Research Record 157, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., U. S. A., pp.1-11 (1967).