Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Naihui Peng1, Jinniu Miao2This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Shuzhe Hu1, Liqian Zhao2, Yue Wang1, Fanyan Meng3, Yang Yi1, and Zhaoxuan Zheng1

1China Oil & Gas Piping Network Corporation, Beijing 102206, China

2China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Corporation ,Langfang 065000, China

3China Petroleum Pipeline Research Institute Co., Ltd. , Langfang 065000, China


 

Received: May 15, 2024
Accepted: July 2, 2024
Publication Date: September 1, 2024

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202506_28(6).0007  


Aiming at the problem that the existing correlation analysis can’t clearly describe the change characteristics of wind power and photovoltaic, this paper takes the clean energy base in the upper reaches of the Yellow River as an example to study the complementarity between wind power and photovoltaic(PV), and analyzes their characteristics and change laws on multiple time scales. A multi-energy complementarity evaluation index system based on the description of fluctuation characteristics is used to evaluate the complementarity of wind and PV power. The results show that wind and PV power are complementary to each other in different time scales, that is, their superposition can reduce their own volatility. This paper further explores the changing law of complementarity under different wind and PV installation ratios, which helps to fully understand the complementarity between different energy sources such as wind and PV, and provides some scientific basis for the planning and design of clean energy bases.


Keywords: Natural gas blending with hydrogen; Multi-energy multi-microgrid network; Nash negotiation; Alternating Direction Multiplier Method


  1. [1] J. Joshi, (2021) “Do renewable portfolio standards increase renewable energy capacity? Evidence from the United States" Journal of Environmental Management 287: 112261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112261.
  2. [2] F. Weschenfelder, G. de Novaes Pires Leite, A. C. Araújo da Costa, O. de Castro Vilela, C. M. Ribeiro, A. A. Villa Ochoa, and A. M. Araújo, (2020) “A review on the complementarity between grid-connected solar and wind power systems" Journal of Cleaner Production 257: 120617. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120617.
  3. [3] A. A. Prasad, R. A. Taylor, and M. Kay, (2017) “Assessment of solar and wind resource synergy in Australia" Applied Energy 190: 354–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.135.
  4. [4] M. Khalid, R. P. Aguilera, A. V. Savkin, and V. G. Agelidis, (2018) “On maximizing profit of wind-battery supported power station based on wind power and energy price forecasting" Applied Energy 211: 764–773. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.061.
  5. [5] N. Bekirsky, C. Hoicka, M. Brisbois, and L. Ramirez Camargo, (2022) “Many actors amongst multiple renewables: A systematic review of actor involvement in complementarity of renewable energy sources" Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 161: 112368. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112368.
  6. [6] A. Solomon, D. M. Kammen, and D. Callaway, (2016) “Investigating the impact of wind–solar complementarities on energy storage requirement and the corresponding supply reliability criteria" Applied Energy 168: 130–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.070.
  7. [7] J. Jurasz, F. Canales, A. Kies, M. Guezgouz, and A. Beluco, (2020) “A review on the complementarity of renewable energy sources: Concept, metrics, application and future research directions" Solar Energy 195: 703–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.087.
  8. [8] A. Z. Sahin, (2000) “Applicability of wind? Solar thermal hybrid power systems in the northeastern part of the Arabian peninsula" Energy sources 22(9): 845–850. DOI: 10.1080/009083100300001645.
  9. [9] Q. Tan, X. Wen, Y. Sun, X. Lei, Z. Wang, and G. Qin, (2021) “Evaluation of the risk and benefit of the complementary operation of the large wind-photovoltaichydropower system considering forecast uncertainty" Applied Energy 285: 116442. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2021.116442.
  10. [10] M. Bo, L. Yan, L. Pan, W. Yimin, M. Chuanhui, and H. Qiang, (2021) “Long-term optimal operation of hydrosolar hybrid energy systems nested with short-term energy curtailment risk" Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 52(6): 712–722. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20200659.
  11. [11] B. Ming, P. Liu, S. Guo, L. Cheng, Y. Zhou, S. Gao, and H. Li, (2018) “Robust hydroelectric unit commitment considering integration of large-scale photovoltaic power: A case study in China" Applied Energy 228: 1341–1352. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.019.
  12. [12] L. Ye, X. Qu, Y. Yao, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Huang, and W. Wang, (2018) “Analysis on intraday operation characteristics of hybrid wind-solar-hydro power generation system" Automation of Electric Power Systems 42(4): 158–164. DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2020.0690.
  13. [13] S. Han, L.-n. Zhang, Y.-q. Liu, H. Zhang, J. Yan, L. Li, X.-h. Lei, and X. Wang, (2019) “Quantitative evaluation method for the complementarity of wind–solar–hydro power and optimization of wind–solar ratio" Applied Energy 236: 973–984. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.059.
  14. [14] Y. Liu, H. Wang, S. Han, J. Yan, and Z. Lu, (2020) “Real-time complementarity evaluation method for realtime complementarity of wind and solar power considering their volatility" Power System Technology 44(9): 3211–3220. DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2020.0759.
  15. [15] D. Cantor, A. Ochoa, and O. Mesa, (2022) “Total variation-based metrics for assessing complementarity in energy resources time series" Sustainability 14(14): 8514. DOI: 10.3390/su14148514.
  16. [16] Z. Huayu, H. Qiang, M. Bo, et al., (2021) “An efficient method for deriving reservoir operating rules by coupling ensemble forecasting information" Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering 40(5): 44–55. DOI: 10.11660/slfdxb.20210505.
  17. [17] K. Wang, Y. Liang, R. Jia, X. Wu, X. Wang, and P. Dang, (2023) “Two-stage stochastic optimal scheduling for multi-microgrid networks with natural gas blending with hydrogen and low carbon incentive under uncertain envinronments" Journal of Energy Storage 72: 108319. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108319.
  18. [18] J. D. Kern, D. Patino-Echeverri, and G. W. Characklis, (2014) “The impacts of wind power integration on subdaily variation in river flows downstream of hydroelectric dams" Environmental Science & Technology 48(16): 9844–9851. DOI: 10.1021/es405437h.
  19. [19] Y. Guo, B. Ming, Q. Huang, Z. Yang, Y. Kong, and X. Wang, (2023) “Variation-based complementarity assessment between wind and solar resources in China" Energy Conversion and Management 278: 116726. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116726.
  20. [20] A. Radovanovi´c and J. V. Milanovi´c, (2021) “Equivalent modelling of hybrid RES plant for power system transient stability studies" IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 37(2): 847–859. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3104625.
  21. [21] W. Wan, H. Wang, and J. Zhao, (2020) “Hydraulic potential energy model for hydropower operation in mixed reservoir systems" Water Resources Research 56(4): e2019WR026062. DOI: 10.1029/2019WR026062.
  22. [22] G. Nikiforidis, M. Van de Sanden, and M. N. Tsampas, (2019) “High and intermediate temperature sodium– sulfur batteries for energy storage: development, challenges and perspectives" RSC advances 9(10): 5649–5673. DOI: 10.1039/C8RA08658C.
  23. [23] X. Zhang, C. ( Qin, E. Loth, Y. Xu, X. Zhou, and H. Chen, (2021) “Arbitrage analysis for different energy storage technologies and strategies" Energy Reports 7: 8198–8206. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.009.
  24. [24] H. Liu, T. Brown, G. B. Andresen, D. P. Schlachtberger, and M. Greiner, (2019) “The role of hydro power, storage and transmission in the decarbonization of the Chinese power system" Applied Energy 239: 1308–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.009.
  25. [25] Y. Zhang, P. E. Campana, A. Lundblad, and J. Yan, (2017) “Comparative study of hydrogen storage and battery storage in grid connected photovoltaic system: Storage sizing and rule-based operation" Applied Energy 201: 397–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.123.
  26. [26] Z. Lu, H. Li, and Y. Qiao, (2018) “Probabilistic flexibility evaluation for power system planning considering its association with renewable power curtailment" IEEE Transactions on Power systems 33(3): 3285–3295. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2810091.


    



 

2.1
2023CiteScore
 
 
69th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.