Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Ngoc-Tran Le1This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Vo Claude2, Philippe Talbot3, and Quoc-Hung Nguyen1

1Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

2La Croix Rouge College, France

3University of Brest, France


 

 

Received: February 3, 2024
Accepted: April 24, 2024
Publication Date: May 24, 2024

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202503_28(3).0019  


The measurement and monitoring of dissolved oxygen (DO) levels play a crucial role in shrimp growth and overall water quality management. To achieve high-tech agriculture standards, it is imperative to continuously measure, monitor, and log DO parameters in real-time. Additionally, the development of a remote control system for aerators based on DO thresholds in shrimp ponds is essential. Currently, most shrimp farms in Vietnam rely on handheld measuring devices utilizing electrochemical sensors. However, this method suffers from low accuracy, requiring frequent sensor calibration due to waterborne contaminants, variations in water temperature, and salinity, indirectly impacting the sensor’s reliability. Moreover, handheld devices are operated by technicians and cannot facilitate automatic and real-time monitoring through smart mobile devices. This paper proposes an innovative architectural model for monitoring and controlling oxygen levels in shrimp ponds, irrespective of day or night. The model incorporates an optical dissolved oxygen sensor, known for its industrial-grade accuracy and Modbus protocol compatibility. Signal processing and data packaging are accomplished through a custom-designed electric circuit, with the data transmitted to the Things Network (TTN) server via a LoraWAN gateway. A web server is developed to enable real-time monitoring and control of the devices. The proposed system provides shrimp farmers with the ability to monitor the concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) in real time. By automatically controlling the fan and aerators, the system enables farmers to adjust the DO level in the water as needed. This technology contributes to enhanced productivity and quality of shrimp cultivation by reducing diseases, preventing oxygen-related shrimp mortality, and minimizing operational expenses through the elimination of manual labor. To improve measurement accuracy and lower costs for shrimp farmers, the system utilizes an industrial DO optical sensor. This eliminates the need for sensor calibration and extends the sensor’s lifespan. Additionally, the system facilitates remote monitoring and control of devices, data storage, report generation, and overall management of shrimp farms. These features promote stability within the shrimp ecosystem and streamline farm operations. Experimental results have demonstrated that the proposed system ensures accurate measurements comparable to commercially available industrial-measured dissolved oxygen handheld devices. As a result, this system is highly suitable for implementation in advanced agricultural environments where technology plays a crucial role.


Keywords: Optical dissolved oxygen sensor, wireless sensor, water quality for shrimp farm, LoraWAN, webserver.


  1. [1] T. DUNG. Viet Nam’s shrimps exported to 100 coun tries. 2023. URL: https://en.baochinhphu.vn/viet-nams-shrimps-exported-to-100-countries111231128103811577.htm#:~:text=VGP%20%2D%20Viet%20Nam%20shrimps%20are,and% 20Rural%20Development%20(MARD). (visited on 01/02/2024).
  2. [2] A.Rahman, J. Dabrowski, and J. McCulloch, (2020) “Dissolved oxygen prediction in prawn ponds from a group of one step predictors" Information Processing in Agri culture 7(2): 307–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpa.2019.08.002.
  3. [3] A. Bulbul Ali and A. Mishra, (2022) “Effects of dis solved oxygen concentration on freshwater fish: A review" International Journal of Fisheries and AquaticStud ies 10: 113–127. DOI: 10.22271/fish.2022.v10.i4b.2693.
  4. [4] Y. Wei, Y. Jiao, D. An, D. Li, W. Li, and Q. Wei, (2019) “Review of dissolved oxygen detection technology: From laboratory analysis to online intelligent detection" Sen sors 19(18): 3995. DOI: 10.3390/s19183995.
  5. [5] H.Tai, Y. Yang, S. Liu, and D. Li. “A review of mea surement methods of dissolved oxygen in water”. In: Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture V: 5th IFIP TC 5/SIG 5.1 Conference, CCTA 2011, Bei jing, China, October 29-31, 2011, Proceedings, Part II 5. Springer. 2012, 569–576. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642 27278-3_58.
  6. [6] A. Weidong and T. Liangying, (2003) “Evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement for the determina tion of dissolved oxygen content in water by iodinimet ric method" CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ANDMETER AGE12(6): 5–7.
  7. [7] L. S. Santos, R. Landers, and Y. Gushikem, (2011) “Application of manganese (II) phthalocyanine synthesized in situ in the SiO2/SnO2 mixed oxide matrix for determi nation of dissolved oxygen by electrochemical techniques" Talanta 85(2): 1213–1216. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.06.003.
  8. [8] S.M.Silva,L.F.Aguiar,R.M.Carvalho,A.A.Tanaka, F. S. Damos, and R. C. Luz, (2016) “A glassy carbon electrode modified with an iron N4-macrocycle and re duced graphene oxide for voltammetric sensing of dis solved oxygen" Microchimica Acta 183: 1251–1259. DOI: 10.1007/s00604-016-1750-6.
  9. [9] A.An,L. Qi, Y. Chou, H. Zhang, and H. Song, (2016) “The study on soft sensor with BP neural network and its application to dissolved oxygen concentration" Comput ers and Applied Chemistry 33(01): 117–121.
  10. [10] S. Gao, Y. Zhang, X. Feng, D. Yuan, B. Wu, and Y. Zhang. “Dissolved Oxygen Measurement in Seawa ter and Sensor Calibration Method”. In: E3S Web of Conferences. 299. EDP Sciences. 2021, 02017. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202129902017.
  11. [11] T. F. Scientific. Thermo Scientific AquaSensors Measure ment System. 2019. URL: https://www.thermofisher. com/document-connect/document-connect.html? url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets% 2FLSG%2FSpecification-Sheets%2FS- ASDSPH E%200920%20Rev%20E%20Web.pdf (visited on 01/03/2024).
  12. [12] Y. Inc. Optical Dissolved Oxygen. 2022. URL: https: //web-material3.yokogawa.com/TI12J06J01-00EN P.pdf (visited on 01/02/2024).
  13. [13] B. B. Benson and D. Krause Jr, (1984) “The concen tration and isotopic fractionation of oxygen dissolved in freshwater and seawater in equilibrium with the atmo sphere 1" Limnology and oceanography 29(3): 620 632. DOI: 10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0620.
  14. [14] B. Debelius, A. Gómez-Parra, and J. Forja, (2009) “Oxygen solubility in evaporated seawater as a function of temperature and salinity" Hydrobiologia 632: 157–165. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9835-4.
  15. [15] F. J. Millero, F. Huang, and A. L. Laferiere, (2002) “Solubility of oxygen in the major sea salts as a function of concentration and temperature" Marine chemistry 78(4): 217–230. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4203(02)00034-8. [16] T. F. Scientific. Orion Star™ A223 Dissolved Oxygen Portable Meter. 2024. URL: https://www.thermofisher. com/order/catalog/product/STARA2230 (visited on 01/02/2024).