Rabiatul Adawiyah Ali1, Nik Nor Liyana Nik Ibrahim This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Wan AzlinaWan Abdul Karim Ghani1, Nor Samsiah Sani2, and Hon Loong Lam3

1Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor 43400, Malaysia
2Center for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor 43600, Malaysia
3Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih, Selangor 43500, Malaysia


Received: December 31, 2021
Accepted: April 19, 2022
Publication Date: May 20, 2022

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202302_26(2).0012  


Process system engineering approaches have a considerably broader reach, which is one of the benefits for decision-makers. Making a decision, however, has many drawbacks. It includes biased decisions, time consuming analyses, and an unpredictable future. A decision-making integration framework based on hybrid process network synthesis and machine learning was presented in this study. The municipal solid waste management case study uses to demonstrate the applicability decision-making framework. The focus of this paper is to facilitate equipment selection for municipal solid waste management. P-graph was used to generate the 160 possible structures. Then, using the WEKA software, the data from the feasible structure would be processed and evaluated using the chosen algorithm. The J48 is the best model for equipment selection using an 80:20 ratio train and test learning technique in WEKA. The kappa statistics J48 algorithm function for the training and testing dataset is 0.9722 and 1. The mean absolute error and root mean square error are 0.0042 and 0.0354. The decision-making integration framework represents by a graphical user interface in MATLAB. The focus of user interface for selection of waste conversion technologies. As a result, the model can be used to determine the best municipal solid waste conversion technology.

Keywords: P-graph, WEKA, optimisation tool, data analytics, decision tool


  1. [1] E. N. Pistikopoulos, A. Barbosa-Povoa, J. H. Lee, R. Misener, A. Mitsos, G. V. Reklaitis, V. Venkatasubramanian, F. You, and R. Gani, (2021) “Process systems engineering – The generation next?" Computers Chemical Engineering 147: 107252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107252.
  2. [2] F. Friedler, K. Tarján, Y. Huang, and L. Fan, (1992) “Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: axioms and theorems" Chemical Engineering Science 47(8): 1973–1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92) 80315-4.
  3. [3] H. L. Lam, (2013) “Extended P-graph applications in supply chain and Process Network Synthesis" Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2(4): 475–486. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2013.10.002.
  4. [4] P. S. Varbanov, F. Friedler, and J. Klemes, (2017) “Process network design and optimisation using P-graph: the success, the challenges and potential roadmap" Chemical Engineering Transactions 61: 1549–1554. DOI: 10.3303/CET1761256.
  5. [5] I. H. Witten, E. Frank, M. A. Hall, and C. Pal. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016.
  6. [6] M. Mohammed, M. Khan, and E. Bashier. Machine Learning: Algorithms and Applications. CRC Press, 2016.
  7. [7] S. Kaza, L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. V. Woerden. What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications, 2018.
  8. [8] D. Ravikumar. “Development of a decision support tool for planning municipal solid waste management systems in India". (phdthesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017.
  9. [9] E. Lebon, N. Madushele, and L. Adelard, (2020) “Municipal solid wastes characterisation and waste management strategy evaluation in insular context: A case study in Reunion island"Waste and Biomass Valorization 11(11): 6443–6453. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-019-00860-1.
  10. [10] B. Sharma and M. Chandel, (2021) “Life cycle cost analysis of municipal solid waste management scenarios for Mumbai, India"Waste Management 124: 293–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.002.
  11. [11] N. Elginoz, K. Khatami, I. Owusu-Agyeman, and Z. Cetecioglu, (2020) “Life Cycle Assessment of an Innovative Food Waste Management System" Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4: DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00023.
  12. [12] G. Francini, L. Lombardi, F. Freire, I. Pecorini, and P. Marques, (2019) “Environmental and Cost Life Cycle Analysis of Different Recovery Processes of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge" Waste and Biomass Valorization 10(12): 3613–3634. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-019-00687-w.
  13. [13] A. Kurbatova and H. Abu-Qdais, (2020) “Using multicriteria decision analysis to select waste to energy technology for a Mega city: The case of Moscow" Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(23): 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/su12239828.
  14. [14] Z. Kabir and I. Khan, (2020) “Environmental impact assessment of waste to energy projects in developing countries: General guidelines in the context of Bangladesh" Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 37: DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100619.
  15. [15] N. Phonphoton and C. Pharino, (2019) “Multi-criteria decision analysis to mitigate the impact of municipal solid waste management services during floods" Resources, Conservation and Recycling 146: 106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.044.
  16. [16] L. Makarichi, K.-A. Techato, and W. Jutidamrongphan, (2018) “Material flow analysis as a support tool for multi-criteria analysis in solid waste management decision-making" Resources, Conservation and Recycling 139: 351–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.024.
  17. [17] T. Dzhuguryan and A. Deja, (2021) “Sustainable waste management for a city multifloor manufacturing cluster: A framework for designing a smart supply chain" Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(3): 1–26. DOI: 10.3390/su13031540.
  18. [18] I. Thushari, J. Vicheanteab, and D. Janjaroen, (2020) “Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment of solid waste management in urban green areas, Thailand" Sustainable Environment Research 30(1): DOI: 10.1186/s42834-020-00057-5.
  19. [19] iEduNote. Decision making: Definition, factors, limitations, ethics of decision making. iEduNote. 2019. URL: https: //www.iedunote.com/decision - makingfactors-limitations-ethics.
  20. [20] K. Aviso, J.-Y. Lee, J. Dulatre, V. Madria, J. Okusa, and R. Tan, (2017) “A P-graph model for multi-period optimization of sustainable energy systems" Journal of Cleaner Production 161: 1338–1351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.044.
  21. [21] M. Kannangara, R. Dua, L. Ahmadi, and F. Bensebaa, (2018) “Modeling and prediction of regional municipal solid waste generation and diversion in Canada using machine learning approaches"Waste Management 74: 3–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.057.
  22. [22] M. Abbasi and A. El Hanandeh, (2016) “Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches" Waste Management 56: 13–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.018.
  23. [23] R. Ali, N. Nik Ibrahim,W.Wan Ab Karim Ghani, H. Lam, and N. Sani, (2022) “Utilization of process network synthesis and machine learning as decision-making tools for municipal solid waste management" International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 19(3): 1985–1996. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03250-0.
  24. [24] R. Ali, N. Ibrahim, and H. Lam, (2019) “Conversion technologies: Evaluation of economic performance and environmental impact analysis for municipal solid waste in Malaysia" Processes 7(10): DOI: 10.3390/pr7100752.
  25. [25] H. Lam, R. Tan, and K. Aviso, (2016) “Implementation of P-graph modules in undergraduate chemical engineering degree programs: experiences in Malaysia and the Philippines" Journal of Cleaner Production 136: 254–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.110.
  26. [26] S. Kumar and I. Chong, (2018) “Correlation analysis to identify the effective data in machine learning: Prediction of depressive disorder and emotion states" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(12): DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122907.


42nd percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.