Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Hsuan Chang This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 and Jia-Jan Guo1

1Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taiwan 251, R.O.C.


 

Received: January 3, 2004
Accepted: May 24, 2004
Publication Date: December 1, 2005

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2005.8.4.04  


ABSTRACT


This paper presents the results of applying the dual approach temperature (DAT) method to an industrial ethylene product recovery and separation process. The entire process including the refrigeration system is simulated for extracting process information for heat exchange network design. The sub-ambient operation temperature feature of the process has demonstrated the advantage of DAT method, which allows the use of a smaller heat exchanger approaching temperature relative to a higher network approaching temperature. Comparing the synthesized optimal network to the existing network, the utility consumption and utility cost saving can be reduced by 35.6% and 21.2%, respectively. The payback year for modifying the existing network is only 0.77 year.


Keywords: Heat Exchange Network, Dual Approach Temperature, Ethylene Process


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Linnhoff, B. and Flower, J. R., “Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Networks: Part I: Systematic Generation of Energy Optimal Networks,” AIChE J., Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 633642 (1978). “Part II: Evolutionary Generation of Networks with Various Criteria of Optimality,” AIChE J., Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 642654 (1978).
  2. [2] Linnhoff, B., Mason, D. R. and Wardle, I., “Understanding Heat Exchanger Networks,” Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 3, No. 14, pp. 295302 (1979).
  3. [3] Linnhoff, B., Townsend, D. W., Boland, D., Hewitt, G. F., Thomas, B. E. A., Guy, A. R. and Marsland, R. H., User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy, IChemE, Rugby, U.K. (1982).
  4. [4] Linnhoff, B. and Hindmarsh, E., “The Pinch Design Method for Heat Exchanger Networks,” Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 745763 (1983).
  5. [5] Challand, T. B., Colbert, R. W. and Venkatesh, C. K., “Computerized Heat Exchanger Networks,” Chem. Eng. Prog., July, pp. 6571 (1981).
  6. [6] Colbert, R. W., “Industrial Heat Exchange Networks,” Chem. Eng. Prog., pp. 4754 (1982).
  7. [7] O’Reilly, M., “Personal View,” The Chem. Engr., Jan., pp. 4647 (1985).
  8. [8] Linnhoff, B and Ahmad, S., “Cost Optimum Heat Exchanger Networks, Part 1: Minimum Energy and Capital using Simple Models for Capital Cost,” Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 729750 (1990). Ahmad, S., B. Linnhoff, and R. Smith, “Part 2: Targets and Design for Detailed Capital Cost Models,” Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 751767 (1990).
  9. [9] Chemstations Inc., CHEMCADTM V.5.0 (1999).
  10. [10] Simulation Science Inc., HEXTRAN, V.8.0 (1997).
  11. [11] Su, J. and Motard, R. L., “Evolutionary Synthesis of Heat-Exchanger Networks,” Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 6780 (1984).
  12. [12] Hall, S. G., Ahmad, S. and Smith, R., “Capital Cost Targets for Heat Exchanger Networks Comprising Mixed Materials of Construction, Pressure Ratings and Exchanger Types,” Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 319335 (1990).