Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Deng Xianshi1, XIAO Zechen1 , WANG Zhiqi1, HUANG Xin2, and FAN Hongtao1

1School of Landscape, Hunan Polytechnic of Environment and Biology, Hengyang 421000, Hunan, China

2Landscape Department, Hunan Vocational Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421000, Hunan, China


 

Received: October 29, 2025
Accepted: January 8, 2026
Publication Date: March 2, 2026

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202608_31.041  


Rockburst is a dynamic instability phenomenon in deep underground engineering, fundamentally governed by crack initiation, propagation, and rapid energy release in highly stressed brittle rock masses. Understanding the coupled effects of stress conditions and dynamic disturbances on crack evolution is essential for improving rockburst prediction and mitigation. In this study, a fracture-mechanics-based numerical framework is devel oped to investigate the influence of stress ratio and stress wave frequency on crack propagation behavior and damage evolution during rockbursts. Controlled sinusoidal stress waves provide cyclic dynamic loading to systematically isolate frequency and stress-ratio effects. The numerical model incorporates cohesive-zone-based fracture behavior to capture crack initiation and unstable propagation, and its predictions are examined through laboratory-informed trend analysis and limited cross-lithology validation. Parametric simulations reveal that decreasing the stress ratio significantly accelerates the crack growth rate and promotes earlier instability, while increasing the stress wave frequency intensifies damage accumulation and fragmentation by enhancing dy namic crack interaction. Crack propagation transitions from stable extension to rapid coalescence as frequency increases, leading to more severe rockburst characteristics. Comparative analyses across different lithologies indicate consistent qualitative trends in crack propagation behavior, despite variations in material properties. Acoustic emission indicators and force-displacement responses further support the identified damage evolution stages. Due to limited specimen numbers, the results are interpreted in a trend-oriented and mechanismbased manner rather than through statistical inference.


Keywords: Fracture Mechanics Theory; Marble; Rock burst action; Stress ratio; Stress wave frequency


  1. [1] M. He, T. Cheng, Y. Qiao, and H. Li, (2023) “A re view of rockburst: Experiments, theories, and simulations" Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 15(5): 1312–1353. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.07.014.
  2. [2] M. He, Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, N. Li, G. Li, and Y. Chen, (2021) “Correlation between the rockburst proneness and friction characteristics of rock materials and a new method for rockburst proneness prediction: field demonstration" Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 205: 108997. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108997.
  3. [3] T. Zhong, Z. Li, D. Song, M. Khan, X. He, Z. Chen, C. Zhou, X. Liu, and P. Feng, (2025) “Mechanism of rock burst vertical damage induced by layered crack structures of the steeply inclined extremely thick coal seams" International Journal of Coal Science & Technology 12(1): 24. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40789-025-00760-x
  4. [4] J. Dai, F. Gong, and L. Xu, (2024) “Rockburst criterion and evaluation method for potential rockburst pit depth considering excavation damage effect" Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 16(5): 1649–1666. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.08.016.
  5. [5] W. Wan and C. C. Li, (2022) “Microscopic and acoustic interpretations of the physics of rock burst and the difference in fracturing patterns in Class I and Class II rocks" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 55(11): 6841–6862. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03015-2.
  6. [6] M. Cai, (2024) “Rockburst risk control and mitigation in deep mining" Deep Resources Engineering 1(2): 100019. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.deepre.2024.100019.
  7. [7] S. Hosseini, D. J. Armaghani, X. He, B. Pradhan, J. Zhou, and D. Sheng, (2024) “Fuzzy cognitive map for evaluating critical factors causing rockbursts in under ground construction: a fundamental study" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 57(11): 9713–9738. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-04045-8.
  8. [8] D. Owusu-Ansah, J. Tinoco, F. Lohrasb, F. Martins, and J. Matos, (2023) “A decision tree for rockburst conditions prediction" Applied Sciences 13(11): 6655. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.3390/app13116655.
  9. [9] F. Ren, C. Zhu, M. Karakus, and M. He, (2024) “Rock burst mitigation mechanisms of pressure relief borehole and rock bolt support: Insights from granite true triaxial unloading rockburst tests" Engineering Geology 336: 107571. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107571.
  10. [10] M. Wu, Y. Ye, Q. Wang, and N. Hu, (2022) “Devel opment of rockburst research: a comprehensive review" Applied Sciences 12(3): 974. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.3390/app12030974.
  11. [11] J.Zhou,Y.Zhang,C.Li,H.He,andX.Li,(2024)“Rock burst prediction and prevention in underground space ex cavation" Underground space 14: 70–98. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2023.05.009.
  12. [12] Y. Fanjie, Z. Hui, X. Haibin, M. U. Azhar, Z. Yong, and C. Fudong, (2022) “Numerical simulation method for the process of rockburst" Engineering Geology 306: 106760. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106760
  13. [13] M. F. Waqar, S. Guo, and S. Qi, (2023) “A comprehensive review of mechanisms, predictive techniques, and control strategies of rockburst" Applied Sciences 13(6): 3950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063950.
  14. [14] C.-l. Wang, C. Cao, C.-f. Li, X.-s. Chuai, G.-m. Zhao, and H. Lu, (2022) “Experimental investigation on synergetic prediction of granite rockburst using rock failure time and acoustic emission energy" Journal of Central South University 29(4): 1262–1273. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-4971-3.
  15. [15] Q.Wang,W.Wu,Y.Wang,M.He,H.Xue,andH.Wei, (2023) “Evolution and control mechanism of rockburst in rock anchored by new energy-absorbing material" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(6): 4569–4582. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03260-z.
  16. [16] K. Ling, Y. Wang, D. Liu, Y. Guo, Z. Zhou, L. Zhang, andM.He,(2023)“Experimental study on rockburst and spalling failure in circular openings for deep underground engineering" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(4): 2607–2631. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03203-0.
  17. [17] B. Khadivi, H. Masoumi, A. Heidarpour, Q. Zhang, and J. Zhao, (2023) “Assessing the fracturing process of rocks based on burst–brittleness ratio (BBR) governed by point load testing" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(11): 8167–8189. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03491-0.
  18. [18] G.-l. Feng, Q. Ma, G. Lacidogna, P.-z. Pan, Z.-f. Wang, and G.-s. Su, (2023) “Experimental study on the failure characteristic and mechanism of granite time-delayed rock burst under true triaxial condition" Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources 9(1): 164. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00706-0
  19. [19] Q. Xiong, H. Guan, H. Ma, Z. Wu, J. Zeng, W. Wang, and H. Wang, (2023) “Crack propagation and induced vibration characteristics of cracked cantilever plates under resonance state: experiment and simulation" Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 201: 110674. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110674.
  20. [20] C.Li,D.Jiang,J.Zhao,T.Zhang,andR.Kuang,(2025) “Dynamic Responses and Crack Propagation of Rock with Crossed Viscoelastic Joints Under Blasting Loads" Materials 18(3): 548. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.3390/ma18030548.
  21. [21] S. Guo, Q. Zhang, M. He, S. Jeon, Y. Gao, and C. Wang, (2024) “Crack propagation behavior and damage extent of rock mass under instantaneous expansion in borehole" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 57(2): 869–888. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03584-w.
  22. [22] Z. Zhou, P. Wang, X. Cai, and W. Cao, (2023) “Influence of water content on energy partition and release in rock failure: implications for water-weakening on rock burst proneness" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(9): 6189–6205. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03379-z.
  23. [23] T.-b. Zhao, P.-f. Zhang, W.-y. Guo, X.-f. Gong, C. Wang, and Y. Chen, (2022) “Controlling roof with potential rock burst risk through different pre-crack length: Mechanism and effect research" Journal of Central South University 29(11): 3706–3719. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5190-7
  24. [24] J. Fan, P. Guo, F. Kong, and X. Shi, (2022) “Experimental study on rock failure characteristics of ejective rock burst based on energy compensation" Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 40(11): 5547–5564. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02232-4.
  25. [25] W.Zhao, Z. Wang, Z. Song, P. Ranjith, H. Zhang, and T. Wang, (2021) “Experimental exploration of damage propagation in rocks using acoustic emission" Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80(8): 6065–6075. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02325-z.
  26. [26] J. S. Jensen, D. M. Frangopol, and J. W. Schmidt. Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Digitalization and Sustainability. Taylor & Francis Group, 2024.
  27. [27] T. Ling, S. Li, D. Liu, and S. Liang, (2023) “Blasting damage of tunnel rock mass based on cumulative effect" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(3): 1679 1695. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03128-8.
  28. [28] W.Wang,Y. Wang, B. Chai, J. Du, L. Xing, and Z. Xia, (2022) “An energy-based method to determine rock brittleness by considering rock damage" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 55(3): 1585–1597. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02727-1
  29. [29] C. C. Li, (2021) “Principles and methods of rock support for rockburst control" Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 13(1): 46–59. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.11.001.
  30. [30] Y. Zhang, X.-T. Feng, Z. Yao, W. Zhang, L. Hu, J. Wang, X. Guo, W. Niu, and Y. Quan, (2023) “Failure characteristics and development mechanism of fault rockburst in a deep TBM tunnel: a case study" Acta Geotechnica 18(10): 5575–5596. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01883-8.
  31. [31] F. Gong, W. Wu, and L. Ren, (2023) “Rockburst process and strength-weakening effect of the high-stress circular tunnel under internal unloading" Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 15(4): 864 885. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.016.
  32. [32] Z. Zhang, X. Qiu, X. Shi, Z. Luo, H. Chen, and C. Zong, (2023) “Burden effects on rock fragmentation and damage, and stress wave attenuation in cut blasting of large-diameter long-hole stopes" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(12): 8657–8675. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03512-y
  33. [33] J. Kan, L. Dou, X. Li, J. Li, and Y. Chai, (2022) “In vestigating the destressing mechanism of roof deep-hole blasting for mitigating rock bursts in underground coal mines" Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 13(1): 2508–2534. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2122594.
  34. [34] G. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Chang, L. Song, C. Zhou, and Z. Wang, (2023) “Analysis on rockburst failure energy evolution of model specimen under stress gradient" Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 56(10): 7255–7268. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03462-5.
  35. [35] X. Bai, A. Cao, W. Cai, Y. Wen, Y. Liu, S. Wang, and X. Li, (2022) “Rock burst mechanism induced by stress anomaly in roof thickness variation zone: a case study" Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 13(1): 1805 1830. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2100832
  36. [36] Z. Waszczyszyn, M. Sło´nski, B. Miller, and G. Pi atkowski. “Bayesian neural networks in the analysis of structural mechanics problems”. In: 8th World congress on computational mechanics (WCCM8), Venice, Italy, EU. 2008.


    



 

2.1
2023CiteScore
 
 
69th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.