Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Aifeng XueThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Department of Foreign Languages, Lyuliang University, Lvliang 033001, Shanxi, China


 

Received: November 17, 2025
Accepted: December 28, 2025
Publication Date: February 1, 2026

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202608_31.003  


The integration of big data analytics and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based solutions has revolutionized English learning at the university level by allowing data-driven and personalized teaching. Although its use is increasing, the current literature mostly uses disaggregated datasets and fails to capture the joint effect of behavior and perception on learning outcomes. The study will fill these gaps by offering a dual-data model which combines secondary big data comprising of the with primary survey data of 230 respondents ( 190 students and 40 teachers). The research question studied is the impact of learner factors, motivation, and interactivity of the platforms on English language proficiency in terms of vocabulary, reading, and speaking. Through descriptive and inferential statistics analysis, it is determined that students who were less proficient in the previous assessment were most improved in their entire learning, especially in reading comprehension. After intervention scores showed that the average vocabulary increase was 0.45 scored and reading improvement 0.62 scored. Survey data showed a range of satisfaction with big data-based platforms ( 2.89 to 3.07 on a 5-point Likert scale) with mostly neutral or slightly positive comments. These findings support the utility of the proposed framework for better teaching practices and student learning, thus supplying universities with large-scale data for their decision-making regarding the improvement of teaching English to non-native speakers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize learning patterns and platform usage, while inferential statistics such as correlation analysis, ANOVA, and regression were applied to examine relationships among variables and validate the significance of the findings.


Keywords: Big Data Analytics, Speaking Proficiency, Learner Motivation, Educational Optimization, Vocabulary Improvement, Behavioral Learning


  1. [1] B. George and O. Wooden, (2023) “Managing the Strategic Transformation of Higher Education through Artificial Intelligence" Administrative Sciences 13(9): 196. DOI: 10.3390/admsci13090196.
  2. [2] P. Gao, J. Li, and S. Liu, (2021) “An Introduction to Key Technology in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Driven e-Learning and e-Education" Mobile Networks and Applications 26(5): 2123–2126. DOI: 10.1007/s11036 021-01777-7.
  3. [3] C.Chang, (2024) “Enhancing EFL University Students’ Readiness for Learning Academic Content in English" English Teaching & Learning 48(3): 439–464. DOI: 10.1007/s42321-023-00139-8.
  4. [4] I. A. Ghashim and M. Arshad, (2023) “Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Teaching and Learning: Modern Trends and Open Challenges" Sustainability 15(21): 15656. DOI: 10.3390/su152115656.
  5. [5] D. Darmawansah, G.-J. Hwang, M.-R. A. Chen, and J.-C. Liang, (2023) “Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education" International Journal of STEM Education 10(1): 12. DOI: 10.1186/s40594 023-00400-3.
  6. [6] D. N. Hidayat, J. Y. Lee, J. Mason, and T. Khaerudin, (2022) “Digital technology supporting English learning among Indonesian university students" Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 17(1): 23. DOI: 10.1186/s41039-022-00198-8.
  7. [7] X. Xiong, (2025) “Influence of teaching styles of higher education teachers on students’ engagement" Education for Chemical Engineers 51: 87–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2025.02.005.
  8. [8] S. Habib, A. Haider, S. S. M. Suleman, S. Akmal, and M. A. Khan, (2022) “Mobile Assisted Language Learning" Electronics 11(7): 1113. DOI: 10.3390/electronics11071113.
  9. [9] D. A. Saini, D. Sharma, and K. Tripathi, (2025) “Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education" IJIREEICE 13(2): DOI: 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2025.13206.
  10. [10] M.ChenandZ.Yuan,(2022)“TeachingModeofEnglish Language and Literature Based on Artificial Intelligence" Mobile Information Systems 2022: DOI: 10.1155/ 2022/1275368.
  11. [11] J. Kim, H. Lee, and Y. H. Cho, (2022) “Learning de sign to support student-AI collaboration" Education andInformationTechnologies27(5): 6069–6104. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6.
  12. [12] M. O. M. Al Ghatrifi, J. S. S. Al Amairi, and M. M. Thottoli, (2023) “Surfing the technology wave" Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4: 100144. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100144.
  13. [13] L. Liu and S.-B. Tsai, (2021) “Intelligent Recognition and Teaching of English Fuzzy Texts" Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2021: 1170622. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1170622.
  14. [14] T. Kumar, S. Akhter, M. M. Yunus, and A. Shamsy, (2022) “Use of Music and Songs as Pedagogical Tools in Teaching English" Education Research International 2022: 3384067. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3384067.
  15. [15] E. Mulatu and T. Regassa, (2022) “Teaching reading skills in EFL classes" Cogent Education 9(1): 2093493. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2093493.
  16. [16] A. Silvola, P. Näykki, A. Kaveri, and H. Muukkonen, (2021) “Expectations for supporting student engagement with learning analytics" Computers & Education 168: 104192. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104192.
  17. [17] D. Dada, O. T. Laseinde, and L. Tartibu, (2023) “Student-Centered Learning Tool for Cognitive Enhancement" Procedia Computer Science 217: 507–512. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.246.
  18. [18] P. Bhardwaj, P. K. Gupta, H. Panwar, M. K. Siddiqui, R. Morales-Menendez, and A. Bhaik, (2021) “Appli cation of Deep Learning on Student Engagement" Computers & Electrical Engineering 93: 107277. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107277.
  19. [19] J. S. Fu, S.-H. Yang, and H.-C. Yeh, (2022) “Digital storytelling and EFL speaking competence" Journal of Research on Technology in Education 54(5): 679 694. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1911008.
  20. [20] A. Derakhshan, J. Fathi, M. Pawlak, and M. Kruk, (2024) “Classroom social climate and student engagement" Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45(8): 3415–3433. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2022.2099407.
  21. [21] S. K. Banihashem, M. Farrokhnia, M. Badali, and O. Noroozi, (2022) “Constructivist learning design and learning analytics" Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59(4): 442–452. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1890634.
  22. [22] W.Hou,(2022) “Analysis of Key Indicators in English Teaching Evaluation" Scientific Programming 2022: 1231700. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1231700.
  23. [23] H. Guo and W. Gao, (2022) “Metaverse-Powered Experiential Situational English Teaching" Frontiers in Psychology 13: DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859159.
  24. [24] L. Ma, (2021) “Immersive Context Teaching Method for College English" Mobile Information Systems 2021: 2637439. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2637439.
  25. [25] J. Li et al., (2024) “Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance academic writing" BMC Medical Education 24(1): 736. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y.
  26. [26] X. Liu, (2024) “Online Learning Based on Learning Analytics in Big Data" International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 17(1): 192. DOI: 10.1007/ s44196-024-00594-6.
  27. [27] X. Jia, (2021) “Role of Big Data Technology in English Teaching Reform" Wireless Communications and Mo bile Computing 2021: 9510216. DOI: 10.1155/2021/ 9510216.
  28. [28] Z. Lv, (2022) “Optimization of University Student Development Strategy" Scientific Programming 2022: 6538069. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6538069.
  29. [29] Z. Yu, L. Yu, Q. Xu, W. Xu, and P. Wu, (2022) “Mobile learning technologies and student engagement" Technology, Pedagogy and Education 31(3): 381–398. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2022.2045215.
  30. [30] F. Ouyang, M. Wu, L. Zheng, L. Zhang, and P. Jiao, (2023) “AI performance prediction and learning analytics" International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/ s41239-022-00372-4.
  31. [31] College English Learning Dataset. Accessed: Nov. 07, 2025. 2025. eprint: https: //www.kaggle.com/datasets/ziya07/college-english-learning-dataset


    



 

2.1
2023CiteScore
 
 
69th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.