Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Han-Yu Deng This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 , Zhi Qu1 , Wenhe Liao1 , and Haibo Yang1

1Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 210094 Nanjing, PRC. China


 

Received: October 15, 2020
Accepted: January 25, 2021
Publication Date: August 1, 2021

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202108_24(4).0013  


ABSTRACT


A parametric study on impinging atomization of gelled fluid is conducted by preparing the simulants and establishing impinging platform. We observe the spray behavior and measure the breakup lengths, spray inclined angles and SMDs (Sauter Mean Diameter) under different jet velocities, impinging angles, skewnesses as well as pre-impinging lengths. The experimental data is also compared to theory. Present results indicate that spray behaviors can be divided into three categories for different jet velocities. Spray angle of the sheet is increased with the increase of the impinging angle. Only a few droplets are produced when impinging angle is 30° revealing a poor atomization quality. Breakup lengths and SMDs decrease as jet velocities and impinging angles are improved. Skewed impingement always gives smaller breakup lengths and SMDs than non-skewed injector, that is, skewness is in favor of impinging atomization. With enhancing the pre-impinging lengths, breakup lengths decrease gradually, but an optimal value exists for the SMD. Moreover, comparison shows that experimental breakup lengths and SMDs agree very well with the theory in high Web number range, however, theoretical results leave an overestimation at low Web number.


Keywords: Gelled fluid, impinging atomization, spray behavior, breakup length, SMD


REFERENCES


  1. [1] H K Ciezki, C Kirchberger, A Stiefel, P Kröger, P Caldas Pinto, J Ramsel, K W Naumann, J Hürttlen, U Schaller, A Imiolek, V Weiser, and Corresponding Author. Overview on the German gel propulsion technology activities: status 2017 and outlook. 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS), pages 1–14, 2017.
  2. [2] Michele Negri and Helmut K. Ciezki. Atomization of viscoelastic fluids with an impinging jet injector: Morphology and physical mechanism of thread formation. Atomization and Sprays, 27(4):319–336, 2017.
  3. [3] Neil S. Rodrigues, Varun Kulkarni, Jian Gao, Jun Chen, and Paul E. Sojka. Spray formation and atomization characteristics of non-Newtonian impinging jets at high Carreau numbers. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 106:280–295, 2018.
  4. [4] N. Jayaprakash and S. R. Chakravarthy. Impingement atomization of gel fuels. 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2003.
  5. [5] Klaus Madlener and Helmut K. Ciezki. Some aspects of rheological and flow characteristics of gel fuels with regard to propulsion application. 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 2009.
  6. [6] Gookhyun Baek, Seokwon Kim, Jeongin Han, and Chongyoup Kim. Atomization characteristics of impinging jets of gel material containing nanoparticles. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 166(21- 22):1272–1285, 2011.
  7. [7] Swarup Y. Jejurkar, Geetanjali Yadav, and D. P. Mishra. Visualizations of sheet breakup of non-Newtonian gels loaded with nanoparticles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 100:57–76, 2018.
  8. [8] Takao Inamura and Minori Shirota. Effect of velocity profile of impinging jets on sheet characteristics formed by impingement of two round liquid jets. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 60:149–160, 2014.
  9. [9] Victor Chernov and Benveniste Natan. Experimental study of a pulsatile injection gel spray. Proceedings 45th Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences 2005, jul 2005.
  10. [10] Li Jun Yang, Qing Fei Fu, Wei Zhang, Ming Long Du, and Ming Xi Tong. Spray characteristics of gelled propellants in novel impinging jet injector. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 29(1):104–113, 2013.
  11. [11] Syed Fakhri, Jong Guen Lee, and Richard A. Yetter. Effect of nozzle geometry on the atomization and spray characteristics of gelled-propellant simulants formed by two impinging jets. Atomization and Sprays, 20(12):1033–1046, 2010.
  12. [12] Qing Fei Fu, Li Jun Yang, Kun Da Cui, and Feng Chen Zhuang. Effects of orifice geometry on gelled propellants sprayed from impinging-jet injectors. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 30(4):1113–1117, 2014.
  13. [13] James Green, Douglas Rapp, and James Ronace. Flow visualization of a rocket injector spray using gelled propellant simulants. jun 1991.
  14. [14] Shai Rahimi and Benveniste Natant. Air-blast atomization of gel fuels. 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 2001.
  15. [15] R Arnold, P. H.S. Santos, O H Campanella, and W E Anderson. Rheological and thermal behavior of gelled hydrocarbon fuels. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 27(1):151–161, 2011.
  16. [16] Jens von Kampen, Francesco Alberio, and Helmut K. Ciezki. Spray and combustion characteristics of aluminized gelled fuels with an impinging jet injector. Aerospace Science and Technology, 11(1):77–83, 2007.
  17. [17] Changjin Yoon, Stephen D. Heister, Paul E. Sojka, Christopher C. Watson, Guoping Xia, and Charles L. Merkle. Injector flow characteristics for gel propellants. 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2011, 2011.
  18. [18] Shai Rahimi and Benveniste Natan. Numerical solution of the flow of power-law gel propellants in converging injectors. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 25(4):203–212, 2000.
  19. [19] N Dombrowski and P. C. Hooper. The effect of ambient density on drop formation in sprays. Chemical Engineering Science, 17(4):291–305, 1962.
  20. [20] Hrishikesh P. Gadgil and B. N. Raghunandan. Effect of skewness on the characteristics of impinging jet atomizers. Atomization and Sprays, 19(1):1–18, 2009.
  21. [21] B. Heislbetz, K. Madlener, and H. K. Ciezki. Breakup characteristics of a newtonian liquid sheet formed by a doublet impinging jet injector. Collection of Technical Papers - 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 7:6754–6764, 2007.
  22. [22] Kent T. Chojnacki and Douglas A. Feikema. Study of non-newtonian liquid sheets formed by impinging jets. 33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1997.
  23. [23] W. Anderson, H. Ryan, S. Pal, and R. Santoro. Fundamental studies of impinging liquid jets. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), jan 1992.
  24. [24] H. M. Ryan, W. E. Anderson, S. Pal, and R. J. Santoro. Atomization characteristics of impinging liquid jets. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 11(1):135–145, 1995.
  25. [25] Dongjun Kim, Ji Hyuk Im, Hyeonseok Koh, and Youngbin Yoon. Effect of ambient gas density on spray characteristics of swirling liquid sheets. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 23(3):603–611, 2007.
  26. [26] C J Clark and N Dombrowski. Aerodynamic instability and disintegration of inviscid liquid sheets. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 329(1579):467–478, 1972.
  27. [27] Li Jun Yang, Qing Fei Fu, Yuan Yuan Qu, Bin Gu, and Meng Zheng Zhang. Breakup of a power-law liquid sheet formed by an impinging jet injector. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 39:37–44, 2012.