Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Furnace interior with TPB sample in place.

Marin Petrovic  1 and Elmedin Mesic1

1University of Sarajevo, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Vilsonovo setaliste 9, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina


 

Received: October 20, 2019
Accepted: January 16, 2020
Publication Date: June 1, 2020

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202006_23(2).0007  

ABSTRACT


Polycrystalline advanced ceramics are composite materials produced by the reaction of tungsten metal powder and carbon powder in a metal binder at temperatures of 1,400-1,500°C. This process enables them a high hardness and abrasion resistance in all directions. The mode I fracture behaviour of single-edge-V-notched-beam specimens was investigated as a function of loading rate and temperature. A series of tests was conducted and plane strain fracture toughness values were determined at a range of loading rates and temperatures, as those in real operating conditions. These experimental results reveal a fracture mechanism establishing a clear connection between the fracture toughness results and the mechanisms causing fracture to happen.


Keywords: Brittle fracture, Fracture mechanics, Impact fracture, Toughness testing, Polycrystalline advanced ceramics.


REFERENCES


 

  1. [1]Morrell, R. (2006). Fracture toughness testing for advanced technical ceramics: Internationally agreed good practice. Adv Appl Ceram, 105, 88-98.
  2. [2]Novikov, N.V. & Dub, S.N. (1996). Hardness and fracture toughness of CVD diamond film. Diamond and related materials, 5, 1026-1030.
  3. [3]Reid, J., Luyckx, S & Fish, M.A. (1999). Modified indenter technique for generating cone cracks in diamond and new results obtained from the technique. Diamond and related materials, 8, 1544-1548.
  4. [4]Sumiya, H. & Irifune, T. (2004). Indentation hardness of nano-polycrystalline diamond prepared from graphite by direct conversion. Diamond and related materials, 13, 1771-1776.
  5. [5]Fischer, H. & Marx, R. (2002). Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method. Dental Mater, 18, 12-19.
  6. [6]Achilles, R.D. & Brondsted, P. (2008). Development of a procedure for fatigue crack growth in PCD. Technical report, Element Six Pty Ltd - internal paper.
  7. [7]Awaji, H. & Sato, S. (1979). Diametral compressive testing method. J Eng Mater Technol, 101, 139-147.
  8. [8]Proveti, J.R.C. & Michot, G. (2006). The Brazilian test: a tool for measuring the toughness of a material and its brittle to ductile transition. Int J Fract, 139, 455-460.
  9. [9]Chen, P., Xie, H., Huang, F., Huang, T. & Ding, Y. (2006). Deformation and failure of polymer bonded explosives under diametric compression test. Polymer Testing, 25, 333-341.
  10. [10]Fairhurst, C. (1964). On the validity of the Brazilian test for brittle materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 1, 535-546.
  11. [11]Petrovic, M., Carolan. D., Ivankovic, A. & Murphy, N. (2011). Role of rate and temperature on fracture and mechanical properties of PCD. Key Eng Mater, 452-453, 153-156.
  12. [12]Mesic, E., Muminovic, A., Repcic, N. & Colic, M. (2011). Stress analysis of the sarafix external fixator design. Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation, 1, 473-480.
  13. [13]Pervan, N., Mesic, E., Colic, M. & Avdic, V. (2016). Stiffness analysis of the sarafix external fixator of composite materials. International Journal of Engineering &Technology, 5(1), 20-24.
  14. [14]Irwin, G.R. (1956). Onset of fast crack propagation in high strength steel and aluminium alloys. In Sagamore Research Conference Proceedings, 2, 289-305.
  15. [15]Kubler, J.J. (2002). Fracture toughness of ceramics using the SEVNB method: From a preliminary study to a test method. Fracture resistance testing of monolithic and composite brittle materials. ASTM 2002, STP 1409.
  16. [16]Petrovic, M., Ivankovic, A. & Murphy, N. (2011). The mechanical properties of polycrystalline diamond as a function of strain rate and temperature. J Eur Cer Soc, 32, 3021-3027.
  17. [17]Petrovic, M. & Kljuno, E. (2017). Thermal decohesion model validity for polycrystalline advanced ceramics, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(7), 1-4.