Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Yumin Vincent Kang This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1 and Hui-Chi Hsu1

1Department of Civil Engineering and PhD Program in Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.


 

Received: November 16, 2012
Accepted: March 1, 2013
Publication Date: March 1, 2013

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2013.16.1.04  


ABSTRACT


Hidden cavities in a coastal dyke are key indications of possible soil subsidence or seepage piping within the soil of the dyke. The main purpose of this research was to study the detectability and location of cavities in a coastal dyke using the ground penetrating radar method (GPR). A series of numerical simulations and field tests were conducted. The results show that the average area difference of GPR signals is influenced by the size of a cavity. Using the average area difference curve, shallow cavities in a coastal dyke can be identified effectively.


Keywords: Flood Disaster, Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Numerical Simulation, GprMAX


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_European_floods.
  2. [2] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_ Katrina.
  3. [3] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_European_floods.
  4. [4] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_African_floods.
  5. [5] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Indian_floods.
  6. [6] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_ South_China_floods.
  7. [7] Information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_ Morakot.
  8. [8] Deistrukt, Geophysical Methods for Structural Investigation and Weak Point Detection in River Embankments and Levees (in German), (2007). Information at http://www.deistrukt.bam.de/home_englisch.htm
  9. [9] Mydlikowski, R., Beziuk, G. and Szynkiewicz, A., “Detection of Inhomogeneities in Structure of Flood Embankments by Means of D.C. Resistivity, GPR and Frequency Electromagnetic Method Measurements,” Acta Geodyn. Geomater., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 8388 (2007).
  10. [10] Annan, A. P., “Radio Interferometery Depth Sounding: Part I Theoretical Discussion,” Geophysics, Vol. 38, pp. 557580 (1973).
  11. [11] Ward, S. H. and Hohmann, G. W., Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics  Theory: 1, In Nabighian, M. N. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 131311 (1987).
  12. [12] Davis, J. L. and Annan, A. P., “Ground-Penetrating Radar for High Resolution Mapping of Soil and Rock Stratigraphy,” Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 37, pp. 531551 (1989).
  13. [13] Kofman, L., Ronen, A. and Frydman, S., “Detection of Model Voids by Identifying Reverberation Phenomena in GPR Records,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 284299 (2006).
  14. [14] Kang, Y. V., “Chiayi Coast Seawall Safety Assessment Analysis by Using GPR,” Research Report of the Fifth River Basin Management Bureau of Taiwan (in Chinese) (2012).