Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Ying-Hong Wang This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Chih-Hao Lin2 and Shih-Wei Lin1

1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taiwan 251, R.O.C.
2Department of Information Science and Applications, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan 413, R.O.C.


 

Received: November 25, 2005
Accepted: March 21, 2006
Publication Date: December 1, 2006

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2006.9.4.10  


ABSTRACT


e-learning has become an important issue in the practice and research recently. A tool or system of distance learning should provide automatic functionalities to decrease the overload of instructors and students compared with the traditional learning style. In this paper, we present an English chat room system in which students can discuss course contents by interacting with teachers and students. First, the novel mechanism provides Learning_Angel Agent and Semantic Agent that act as supervisors that constantly handle queries online. Next, the mechanism provides a QA subsystem that acts as an assistant. The Learning_Angel Agent can detect syntax errors made by online users. The Semantic Agent can check the semantic meaning of each sentence. Sometimes, learners make semantic level mistakes. This implies that they do not understand the course topic or some particular issue. The semantic agent can, thus, give some suggestions for corrections to the users and analyze the data in the learner corpus. Moreover, when users query the system or other online users, this system will attempt to find answers from the knowledge ontology or learner corpus that is stored in the records of previous users’ comments. Furthermore, if enough QA pairs can be accumulated, the FAQ can act as a powerful learning tool for learners.


Keywords: Agent, Semantic Technology, Distance Learning, Link Grammar, Ontology


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Tsang, H. W., Hung, L. M. and Ng, S. C., “A multimedia distance learning system on the Internet,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Vol. 2, pp. 243246 (1999).
  2. [2] Adhvaryu, S. and Balbin, I., “How Useful is Multimedia on the WWW for Enhancing Teaching and Learning?” Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS’98), Austin, U.S.A. (1998).
  3. [3] Harris, D., Cordero, C. and Hsieh, J., “High-Speed Network for Delivery of Education-on-Demand,” Proceeding of Multimedia Computing and Networking Conference (MCN’96), San Jose, California, U.S.A. (1996).
  4. [4] Willis, Barry, “Distance Education at a Glance,” Engineering Outreach at the University of Idaho, http:// www.uidaho.edu/evo/distglan.html
  5. [5] Goldberg, M. W. and Salari, S., “An Update on WebCT (World-Wide-Web Course Tools) – a Tool for the Creation of Sophisticated Web-Based Learning Environments,” Proceedings of NAUWeb’97 – Current Practices in Web-Based Course Development, Flagstaff, Arizona (1997)
  6. [6] Goldberg, M. W., Salari, S. and Swoboda, P., “World Wide Web Course Tool: An Environment for Building WWW-Based Courses,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems (1996).
  7. [7] Goldberg, M. W., “Student Participation and Progress Tracking for Web-based Courses Using WebCT,” Proceedings of the Second International N.A. Web conference, Fredericton, NB, Canada (1996).
  8. [8] Sleator, D. K., Davy Temperley, Parsing English with a Link Grammar, CMU-CS-91-196 (1991).
  9. [9] Weibel, S., Gridby, J. and Miler, E., OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop Report, Dublin, EUA, (1995) http:// www.oclc.org:5046/oclc/research/conferences/metadata/dublin_core_report.html
  10. [10] Wang, Y.-H. and Lin, C.-H., “A Multimedia Database Supports English Distance Learning,” An International Journal Information Sciences, Vol. 158, pp. 189208 (2004).
  11. [11] Wible, D., Kuo, C.-H., Chien, F.-Y. and Taso, N. L., “Automating Repeated Exposure to Target Vocabulary for Second Language Learners,” Advanced Learning Technologies, 2001. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on, pp. 127128 (2001).
  12. [12] Ide, N., Reppen, R. and Suderman, K., “The American National Corpus: More then Web can Provide Proceedings of the Third Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC),” Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, pp. 839844 (2002).
  13. [13] Ide, N., “The American National Corpus: Everything You Always wanted to Know… and weren’t Afraid to Ask,” Invited Keynote, Corpus Linguistics, Lancaster, UK (2003).
  14. [14] American National Corpus, http://americannationalcorpus.org/
  15. [15] British National Corpus, http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
  16. [16] Yael Ravin, “Grammar Errors and Style Weaknesses in a Text-critiquing System,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 31, pp. 108115 (1988).
  17. [17] Microsoft MSDN on line Library, http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/
  18. [18] Deborah, L., McGuinness and Frank van Harmelen, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation (2004).
  19. [19] Labrou, Y. and Finin, T., Yahoo! as an ontology — Using Yahoo! Categories to describe documents, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Kansas City, MO, pp. 180187 (1999).
  20. [20] Wible, D., Kuo, C.-H., Chien, F.-Y. and Taso, N. L., “Automating Repeated Exposure to Target Vocabulary for Second Language Learners,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 127128 (2001).
  21. [21] Jianming Li, Lei Zhang and Yong Yu, “Learning to Generate Semantic Annotation for Domain Specific Sentences,” In the Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation at the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), Victoria, B.C., Canada (2001).