Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Jin-Shin Ho1, C. B. Lin This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.and C. H. Liu1

1Department of Mechanical and Electromechanical Engineering Tamkang University Tamsui, Taiwan 251, R.O.C. 


 

Received: December 4, 2002
Accepted: December 30, 2002
Publication Date: March 1, 2003

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2003.6.1.07  


ABSTRACT


The bonding of an S45C steel inserted into copper during cast welding and heat treatment was examined. The interface shear strength was made with a push-out test. After cast welding, a cast-welding layer formed between steel and copper. After marquenching, martempering and austempering heat treatment, there was a cast-welding layer near the steel matrix, an irregular layer near the copper matrix and between of them was a middle layer. Through X-ray diffraction analysis was used to determine that the interface layer consisted of carbon and CuFeO2. Through electron probe X-ray microanalysis (EPMA), it was showed that iron atoms and carbons, mostly, diffused into the copper matrix. The interface shear strengths of the compound casting while with marquenching, martempering, and austempering were 6.29 MPa, 8.23 MPa, and 8.33 MPa, respectively; The fractured region was all happened near S45C steel matrix in the cast welding layer.


Keywords: S45C, Copper, Cast Welding, Marquenching, Martempering, Austempering


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Warrier, K. G. K. and Rohatgi, P. K., “Mechanical, Electrical, and Electrical Contact Properties of Cu-TiO2 Composites,” Powder Met. Int. Vol. 29, pp. 65-69 (1986).
  2. [2] Hart, R. R., Wonsiewicz, B. C. and Chin, B. Y., “High Strength Copper Alloys by Thermomechanical Treatments,” Met. Trans. Vol.1, pp. 3163-3172 (1970).
  3. [3] Chrysanthou, A. and Erbaccio, G., “Production of Copper-Matrix Composites by in Situ Processing”, J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 30, pp. 6339-6344 (1995).
  4. [4] Petitcorps, Y. L., Pailler, R. and Naslain, R., “The Fibre/Matrix Interfacial Shear Strength in Titanium Alloy Matrix Composites Reinforced by SiC or B CVD Filaments,” Comp. Sci. Tech. Vol. 35, pp. 207-214 (1989).
  5. [5] Choi, S. K., Chandrasekaran, M. and Brabers, M. J., “Interaction Between Titanium and SiC,” J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 25, pp. 1957-1964 (1990).
  6. [6] Shieu, F. S., Raj R. and Sass, S. L., “Control of the Mechanical Properties of MetalCeramic Interfaces Through Interfacial Reactions,” Acta Metall. Mater. Vol. 38, pp. 2215-2224 (1990).
  7. [7] Lu, Y. C., Sass, S. L., Bay, Q., Kohlstedt, D. L. and Gerberich, W. W., “The Influence of Interfacial Reactions on the Fracture Toughness of Ti-Al2O3,” Acta Metall. Mater. Vol. 43, pp. 31-41 (1995).
  8. [8] Evans, A. G., Zok, F. W. and Davis, I., “The Role of Interfaces in Fiber-Reinforced Brittle Matrix Composites,” Comp. Sci. Tech. Vol. 42, pp. 3-24 (1991).
  9. [9] Klomp, J. T., Ceramic Microstructure: Role of Interfaces (Ed. J. A. Pask and A. G. Evans), p. 307 (1986).
  10. [10] Qian, M., Harada, S., Yanxiang, L. and Donjun, M., “On the Fabrication of Steel-WireReinforced White Cast Irons,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. A206, pp. 104-109 (1996).
  11. [11] Yang, C. J., Jeng, S. M. and Yang, J. M., ”Interfacial Properties Measurement for SiC Fiber-Reinforced Titanium Alloy Composites,” Scripta Meter. Mat. Vol. 24, pp. 469-474 (1990).
  12. [12] Lewis, M. H. and Murthy, V. S. R., “Microstructural Characterisation of Interfaces in Fibre-Reinforced Ceramics,” Comp. Sci. Tech. Vol. 42, pp. 221-249 (1991).
  13. [13] Durrant, G., Gallerneault, M. and Cantor, B., “Squeeze Cast Aluminum Reinforced with Mild Steel Inserts,” J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 31, pp. 589-602 (1996).
  14. [14] Dieter, G. E., Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill, London, U.K. pp. 257-258 (1988).
  15. [15] Zener, C., The Micro-Mechansim of Fracture, in Fracturing of Metals, Amer. Soc. Metals, Metals Park, OH, U.S.A. (1948).