Heat Rate and Economic Evaluation of a Photovoltaic- Assisted Combine Cycle Power Plant

Klahan  Suksawai; Pongsakorn  Kachapongkun

doi:10.6180/jase.202405_27(5).0008

Heat Rate and Economic Evaluation of a Photovoltaic- Assisted Combine Cycle Power Plant

Klahan Suksawai, Pongsakorn KachapongkunThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Rattanakosin Collage for Sustainable Energy and Environment, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Received: April 18, 2023
Accepted: July 10, 2023
Publication Date: October 5, 2023

Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202405_27(5).0008

Gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power plants are widely used as major power plants in grid systems, while world energy prices are rather high and renewable energy is now stepping in to replace conventional fossil energy. Therefore, the efficiency of the GTCC needs to be improved for both thermal efficiency and economic aspects. This concept will help GTCC improve its heat rate by bringing in renewable energy. In the present research, the installation of solar photovoltaics (PV) in the GTCC power plant for supplying the auxiliary equipment of the power plant was studied. The heat rate comparison between the proposed method and conventional GTCC, including an economic evaluation, was conducted through a case study of an independent power producer operating a 700 MW GTCC in Thailand. The performance test and calculation methodology followed the Performance Test Code 46 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, which eliminated the uncontrollable impact of environments. As a result, the PV system could replace some of the auxiliary power consumption by utilizing a PV system of 980 kW, the GTCC heat rate was improved to 59.17 kJ/kWh, and the electrical power generation was 1,393,379 kWh per year, which reduced the natural gas consumption by 10,086,671 MJ annually or 100,867 GJ for the remaining lifetime of the power plant.

Keywords: Combine cycle, Photovoltaics, Auxiliary power consumption, Economic

[1] Share of electricity production from renewables, 2022. 2023. URL: https: //ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-electricity-renewables.
[2] M. Mehrpooya, M. Taromi, and B. Ghorbani, (2019) “Thermo-economic assessment and retrofitting of an existing electrical power plant with solar energy under different operational modes and part load conditions" Energy Reports 5: 1137–1150. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.07.014.
[3] M. Ameri and M. Mohammadzadeh, (2018) “Thermodynamic, thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment of a novel integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) power plant" Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 27: 192–205.
[4] N. Abdelhafidi, ˙I. H. Yılmaz, and N. E. I. Bachari, (2020) “An innovative dynamic model for an integrated solar combined cycle power plant under off-design conditions" Energy Conversion and Management 220: 113066. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113066.
[5] N. Zhang, G. Yu, C. Huang, L. Duan, H. Hou, E. Hu, Z. Ding, and J. Wang, (2020) “Full-day dynamic characteristics analysis of a solar aided coal-fired power plant in fuel saving mode" Energy 208: 118424. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118424.
[6] K. B. Kiran, M. Indira, R. Nagaraja, et al., (2021) “Mathematical modeling and evaluation of performance characteristics of a hybrid solar PV and wind energy system" Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 25(4): 785–797. DOI: 10.6180/jase.202208_25(4).0014.
[7] M. Jiang, Y. Lv, T. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Liu, X. Yu, and J. Yan, (2019) “Performance analysis of a photovoltaics aided coal-fired power plant" Energy Procedia 158: 1348–1353. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.330.
[8] G. Khankari and S. Karmakar, (2018) “Power generation from fluegas waste heat in a 500 MWe subcritical coal-fired thermal power plant using solar assisted Kalina Cycle System 11" Applied Thermal Engineering 138: 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.096.
[9] H. Nami, A. Anvari-Moghaddam, and A. Arabkoohsar, (2020) “Thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analyses of a waste-fired trigeneration plant" Energies 13(10): 2476. DOI: 10.3390/en13102476.
[10] Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. 2023. URL: https: //www.egat.co.th..
[11] G. ¸Sen, M. Nil, H. Mamur, H. Do˘gan, M. Karamolla, M. Karaçor, F. Kuyucuo˘glu, N. Yörükeren, and M. R. A. Bhuiyan, (2018) “The effect of ambient temperature on electric power generation in natural gas combined cycle power plant—A case study" Energy Reports 4: 682–690. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.10.009.
[12] M. Islam, M. Hasanuzzaman, A. Pandey, and N. Rahim. “Modern energy conversion technologies”. In: Energy for sustainable development. Elsevier, 2020, 19–39.
[13] P. Breeze. Gas-Turbine power generation. Academic Press, 2016.
[14] T. K. Ibrahim, M. Rahman, and A. N. Abdalla, (2011) “Gas turbine configuration for improving the performance of combined cycle power plant" Procedia engineering 15: 4216–4223.
[15] J. W. Burnett and L. L. Kiesling, (2019) “Power plant heat-rate efficiency as a regulatory mechanism: Implications for emission rates and levels" Energy Policy 134: 110980. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110980.
[16] S. M. Kim, W. N. Yun, C. H. Jang, and S. I. Park, (2016) “Plant Minimum Stable Load (Pmin) Test for Ilijan CCPP" KEPCO Journal on Electric Power and Energy 2(1): 83–88.
[17] P. G. Deen, J. Gutierrez, T. B. Sullivan, and J. R. Friedman. “Comparison of ASME PTC-46 Performance Test Correction Factors as Estimated in a Project Proposal Phase to Those Determined During Project Implementation”. In: ASME Power Conference. 42738. 2007, 713–726. DOI: 10.1115/POWER2007-22107.
[18] S. Pandey and R. Kumar, (2017) “Analysis of auxiliary energy consumption in utility scale solar PV power plant" International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology 7(5): 1728–1729.
[19] T. N. Raval and R. Patel, (2013) “Optimization of auxiliary power consumption of combined cycle power plant" Procedia Engineering 51: 751–757. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.107.
[20] K. Mongkoldhumrongkul, (2023) “Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic rooftop system on car parking area in Rayong, Thailand" Energy Reports 9: 202–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.421.
[21] 2023. URL: https://globalsolaratlas.info/download/ thailand.
[22] Total solar energy capacity in Thailand from 2012 to 2022(in megawatts). 2023. URL: https: //www.statista.com/statistics/1006141/thailand-total-solar-energy-capacity/.
[23] S. Kurtz, J. Newmiller, A. Kimber, R. Flottemesch, E. Riley, T. Dierauf, J. McKee, and P. Krishnani. Analysis of photovoltaic system energy performance evaluation method. Tech. rep. National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2013.
[24] D. G. Dhavale and J. Sarkis, (2018) “Stochastic internal rate of return on investments in sustainable assets generating carbon credits" Computers & Operations Research 89: 324–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2017.02.014.
[25] A. Orioli and A. Di Gangi, (2017) “Six-years-long effects of the Italian policies for photovoltaics on the grid parity of grid-connected photovoltaic systems installed in urban contexts" Energy 130: 55–75. DOI: 10.1016/j. energy.2017.04.069.