Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Ming-Hui Huang This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Yuh-Yi Lin1 and Ming-Xi Weng1

1Department of Civil Engineering, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taiwan 251, R.O.C.


 

Received: January 12, 2012
Accepted: April 6, 2012
Publication Date: December 1, 2012

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2012.15.4.10  


ABSTRACT


This paper aims to study the aerodynamic behavior of bridges under skew wind by performing a series of section model tests and a numerical analysis. Two types of deck cross sections, with the width-to-depth (B/H) ratios of 5 and 10, were used in the test and the numerical analysis. The section model tests included measurements of the aerodynamic coefficients and flutter derivatives, the flutter critical wind speeds, and the buffeting responses. The effects of yaw angles were investigated both in the tests and the numerical analysis. The experimental results show that for the section model with B/H ratio of 5, the lowest flutter wind speed occurs at a negative angle of wind attack and a zero yaw angle. For the section model with B/H ratio of 10, the lowest flutter wind speed occurs at a negative angle of wind attack and a yaw angle of 20 degrees. These results also indicate that in the case of zero angle of wind attack, the flutter critical wind speeds increase with the yaw angles and the buffeting responses decrease as the yaw angles increase. To verify the applicability and validity of this analytical approach, an example is provided. Comparisons show that the calculated results obtained from this approach follow the same trend with the experimental results. The results obtained from the conventional method (mean wind decomposition) may not be applicable for large yaw angles.


Keywords: Flutter, Buffeting, Bridge, Wind Tunnel Test, Skew Wind


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Tanaka, H. and Davenport, A. G., “Results of Taut Strip Models to Turbulent Wind,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, Vol. 108, pp. 3349 (1982).
  2. [2] Zhu, L. D., Wang, M., Wang, D. L., Guo, Z. S. and Cao, F. C., “Flutter and Buffeting Performances of Third Nanjing Bridge over Yangtze River under Yaw Wind via Aeroelastic Model Test,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 95, pp. 15791606 (2007).
  3. [3] Zhu, L. D. and Chang, G. Z., “Study of Flutter Performance of Flat Box Deck Bridge under Skew Wind via Wind Tunnel Test,” Journal of Bridge Construction, Vol. 2, pp. 710 (2006) (in Chinese).
  4. [4] Xie, J. and Tanaka, H., “Buffeting Analysis of Long Span Bridges to Turbulent Wind with Yaw Angle,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 37, pp. 6577 (1991).
  5. [5] Kimura, K. and Tanaka, H., “Bridge Buffeting Due to Wind with Yaw Angles,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 42, pp. 13091320 (1992).
  6. [6] Zhu, L. D., Xu, Y. L., Zhang, F. and Xiang, H. F., “Tsing Ma Bridge Deck under Skew Winds Part I: Aerodynamic Coefficients,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 90, pp. 781805 (2002).
  7. [7] Zhu, L. D., Xu, Y. L. and Xiang, H. F., “Tsing Ma Bridge Deck under Skew Winds Part II: Flutter Derivatives,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 90, pp. 807837 (2002).
  8. [8] Xu, Y. L. and Zhu, L. D., “Buffeting Response of Long-Span Cable-Supported Bridges under Skew Winds. Part 2: Case Study,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 281, pp. 647673 (2005).
  9. [9] Ding, Q. Y., Zhou, Z. Y., Zhu, L. D. and Xiang, H. F., “Identification of Flutter Derivatives of Bridge Decks with Free Vibration Technique,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 98, pp. 1223 (2010).
  10. [10] Scanlan, R. H., “Estimates of Skew Wind Speeds for Bridge Flutter,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 4, pp. 9598 (1999).
  11. [11] Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R. H., Wind Effects on Structures, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996).
  12. [12] Sarkar, P. P., Jones, N. P. and Scanlan, R. H., “System Identification for Estimation of Flutter Derivatives,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 42, pp. 12431254 (1992).
  13. [13] Piccardo, G., Carassale, L. and Freda, A., “Critical Conditions of Galloping for Inclined Square Cylinders,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 99, pp. 748756 (2011).
  14. [14] Lin, Y. Y., Cheng, C. M. and Lan, C. Y., “Effects of Deck’s Width-to-Depth Ratios and Turbulent Flows on the Aerodynamic Behaviors of Long-Span Bridges,” Wind and Structures, Vol. 6, pp. 263278 (2003).
  15. [15] Lin, Y. Y., Cheng, C. M., Wu, J. C., Lan, T. L. and Wu, K. T., “Effects of Deck Shape and Oncoming Turbulence on Bridge Aerodynamics,” Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. 4356 (2005).