Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Chung-Ho Chen  1

1Department of Industrial Management Southern Taiwan University of Technology Yungkang, Tainan 710, R.O.C.


 

Received: June 24, 2003
Accepted: September 25, 2003
Publication Date: December 1, 2003

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2003.6.4.07  


ABSTRACT


The distribution of quality characteristic of a product is usually assumed to be known. In some situation, the quality characteristic of a product cannot be measured directly. It needs to be measured by controlling another factor. Wen and Mergen (1999) presented a method for determining the optimum process mean in order to minimize the expected total loss of a product. However, they have not considered the quality loss for a product within specification in the model. In this paper, we will propose a modified Wen and Mergen’s (1999) model taking into account an indirect quality characteristic with the quadratic or linear asymmetrical quality loss of a product within specifications.


Keywords: Quality Loss Function, Process Mean, Process Standard Deviation, Target Value, Specification Limits


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Li, M.-H. C. “Optimal Setting of the Process Mean for Asymmetrical Quadratic Quality Loss Function,” Proceedings of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers Conference, pp. 415-419 (1997).
  2. [2] Li, M.-H. C. “Optimal Setting of the Process Mean for an Asymmetrical Truncated Loss Function,” Proceedings of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers Conference, pp. 532-537 (1998).
  3. [3] Li, M.-H. C. “Quality Loss Function Based Manufacturing Process Setting Models for Unbalanced Tolerance Design,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, pp. 39-45 (2000)
  4. [4] Li, M.-H. C. “Unbalanced Tolerance Design and Manufacturing Setting with Asymmetrical Linear Loss Function,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 20, pp. 334-340 (2002a).
  5. [5] Li, M.-H. C. “Optimal Process Setting for Unbalanced Tolerance Design with Linear Loss Function,” Journal of The Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 19, pp. 17-22 (2002b).
  6. [6] Li, M.-H. C. and Chirng, H.-S.. “Optimal Setting of the Process Mean for Asymmetrical Linear Quality Loss Function,” 1999 Conference on Technology and Applications of Quality Management for Twenty-first Century, pp. 2-6-2-11 (1999).
  7. [7] Maghsoodloo, S. and Li, M.-H. C. “Optimal Asymmetrical Tolerance Design,”IIE Transactions, Vol. 32, pp. 1127-1137 (2000).
  8. [8] Li, M.-H. C. and Chou, C.-Y. “Target Selection for an Indirectly Measurable Quality Characteristic in Unbalanced Tolerance Design,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 17, pp. 516-522 (2001).
  9. [9] Li, M -H. C. and Wu, F.-W. “A General Model of Manufacturing Setting with Asymmetric Linear Loss Function,” The 38th Annual Conference of Chinese Society for Quality and The 6th National Quality Management Symposium, pp. 1137-1143 (2002).
  10. [10] Wen, D. and Mergen, A. E. “Running a Process with Poor Capability,” Quality Engineering, Vol. 11, pp. 505-509 (1999).