Comparison between Model- and pH/ORP- Based Process Control for an AAA System

Hyunook Kim; Oliver J. Hao; Thomas J. McAvoy

doi:10.6180/jase.2000.3.3.06

Comparison between Model- and pH/ORP- Based Process Control for an AAA System

Hyunook Kim¹, Oliver J. Hao This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.¹ and Thomas J. McAvoy²

¹Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
²Institute for System Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

Received: March 1, 2000
Accepted: September 1, 2000
Publication Date: September 1, 2000

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2000.3.3.06

ABSTRACT

Model-based and on-line sensor control schemes in an alternating aerobic/anoxic system for nitrogen removal were applied and compared for system performance. A linear model was developed by simplifying the well known Activated Sludge Model No. 1 and incorporated into an optimization scheme. A program was developed to detect control points on the pH and ORP profiles to control aeration duration in an alternating system. Both systems demonstrate good COD (85%) and nitrogen (76-80%) removal efficiencies, with a range of the aeration ratio (aeration cycle time/total cycle time) 0.23 to 0.3. Both systems could save significant aeration energy, in addition to handling the variation of influent nitrogen loading. The model-based optimization approach has some advantages over the pH and ORP sensor control scheme, since the effluent ammonia level can be set by an operator according to the effluent regulation. Conversely, the online sensor based control scheme can be easily applied into a real system, since it does not require calibration or measurements of influent compositions.

Keywords: nitrogen removal, process control, pH/ORP, model

REFERENCES

[1] Anderson, J. S., Kim, H., McAvoy, T. J. and Hao, O. J., “Control of an Alternating Aerobic-Anoxic Activated Sludge System - Part 1: Development of a Linearization-Based Modeling Approach,” Control Engr. Practice, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 271-278 (2000).
[2] Anderson, J. S., McAvoy, T. J. and Hao, O. J., “Use of Hybrid Models in Wastewater Systems,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (In press).
[3] APHA, Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed., American Public Heath Association, Washington, DC, (1995).
[4] Coen, F., Vanderhaegen, B., Boonen, I., Vanrolleghem, P. A. and van Meenen, P., “Improved Design and Control of Industrial and Municipal Nutrient Removal Plants using Dynamic Models,” Water Sci. Technol., Vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 53-61 (1997).
[5] Culter, C. and Ramker, B., “Dynamic Matrix Control - a Computer Control Algorithm,” paper No. 51b, AlChE National Meeting, Houston, TX, (1979).
[6] Daigger, G. T. and Nolasco, D., “Evaluation and Design of Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant using Biological Process Models,” Water Sci. Technol., Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 245-255 (1995).
[7] Henze, M. , Grady, C. P. L., Gujer, W., Marais, G. v. R. and Matsuo, T., “Activated Sludge Model No. 1,” IAWPRC Sci. Tech. Report No. 1, London, England, pp 33 , (1986).
[8] Kim, H. and Hao, O. J., “pH and ORP Control Strategy for Optimization of Nitrogen Removal in an Alternating Aerobic/Anoxic System,” Water Environ. Res. (submitted).
[9] Kim, H. , McAvoy, T. J., Anderson, J. S. and Hao, O. J., “Control of an Alternating Aerobic-Anoxic Activated Sludge System - Part 2: Optimization using a Linearized Model,” Control Engr. Practice, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 279-289 (2000).
[10] Stokes, L., Takacs, I., Watson, B. and Watts, B., “Dynamic Modeling of an ASP Sewage Works - a Case Study,” Water Sci. Technol., Vol. 28, No. 11/12, pp. 151-162 (1993).