Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

Chien-Jong Shih1, Woe-Chun Liu1 and R.A.S. Wangsawidjaja1

1Department of Mechanical Engineering Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taiwan 25137, R.O.C.


 

Received: January 20, 1998
Accepted: March 30, 1998
Publication Date: March 30, 1998

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.1998.1.1.03  


ABSTRACT


This paper present two robust design strategies in structural system that simultaneously optimize the design goal-performance and minimize its performance variability. As a result, the maximization of a predefined goal-reliability indicator is equivalent to the optimization of the goal-performance and the performance variation concurrently. Fuzzy set theory is applied to formulate another way of dealing with such robust designs. Both single and multiple goal problems are investigated with random design variables and probabilistic constraints. This optimization approach can produce the highest goal-reliability, which is higher than that of a fixed goal-performance.


Keywords: Structural optimization, Robust design, Multiobjective fuzzy optimization, Goal reliability.


REFERENCES


  1. [1]. Arora, J. S., Introduction to Optimum Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp.489-493 (1989).
  2. [2]. Chang, H., “A Simple Computer-Aided Design Procedure for Minimal Variations,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 73, pp. 99-107 (1989).
  3. [3]. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., “Chance Constrained Programming,” Management & Science, Vol. 6, pp. 73-79 (1959).
  4. [4]. Oh, H. L., “Variation Tolerance Design,” Proc. of ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Production Engineering Division, Vol. 115, pp. 137-146 (1987).
  5. [5]. Parkinson, A., Sorensen, C. and Pourhassan, N., “A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 115, pp. 74-80 (1993).
  6. [6]. Rao, S. S., “Structural Optimization by Chanced Programming Techniques,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 12, pp. 777-781 (1980).
  7. [7]. Rao, S. S., “Multi-Objective Optimization of Fuzzy Structural Systems,” Int. J. Numerical Methods in Eng., Vol. 24, pp. 1157-1171 (1987).
  8. [8]. Rao, S. S., Sundararaju, K., Prakash, B. G. and Balakrishna, C., “Multiobjective Fuzzy Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 42(1), pp. 37-44 (1992).
  9. [9]. Rosenblatt, M., “Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation,”Ann. Math. Statist., Vol. 23(3), pp. 470-472 (1952).
  10. [10].Shih, C. J. and Lai, T. K., “Fuzzy Weighting Optimization with Several Objective Functions in Structural Design,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 52(5), pp. 917-924 (1994).
  11. [11].Shih, C. J. and Wangsawidjaja, R. A. S., “Mixed Fuzzy-Probabilistic Programming Approach for Multiobjective Engineering Optimization with Random Variables,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 59(2), pp. 283-290 (1996).
  12. [12].Torng, T. Y. and Yang, R. J., “A Reliability-Based Design Optimization Procedure for Minimal Variations,” AIAA paper, No. 94-1415-CP, pp. 842-852 (1994).
  13. [13].Wong, F. S., “First-Order, Secont-Moment Methods,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 20(4), pp.779-791 (1985).
  14. [14].Zadeh, L., “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338-353 (1965). 


    



 

1.6
2022CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.