Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Chih-Heng Ke1 and Yun-Shuai Yu This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.2

1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Quemoy University, Kinmen, Taiwan 892, R.O.C.
2Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan 632, R.O.C.


 

Received: October 1, 2017
Accepted: March 30, 2018
Publication Date: September 1, 2018

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.201809_21(3).0014  

ABSTRACT


For the improvement of video transmission, most current solutions transmit the most important sub-stream of a video by the detour method to avoid a congested link. However, they cannot improve the transmission quality if they fail to find an alternative path with an acceptable transmission delay and sufficient bandwidth resources. Besides, investigations in an experimental software defined network platform found that the transmission quality achieved by the above methods is relatively poor when the path needs to be switched constantly due to rapid changes in network quality. Therefore, this paper proposes a method of preferential detour for unimportant data streams and finds that it can significantly improve the video transmission quality. Simulation results show that the proposed method can increase the throughput of the video by around 10% and enhance the video quality about 0.5 dB at the receiver end.


Keywords: Video Transmission, Software Defined Network, Detour, Unimportant Data Stream


REFERENCES


  1. [1] McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G.,Peterson, L.,Rexford, J.,Shenker,S.andTurner,J., “Open Flow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 6974 (2008).
  2. [2] Civanlar, S., Parlakisik, M., Tekalp, A. M., Gorkemli, B., Kaytaz, B. and Onem, E., “A Qos-enabled Openflow Environment for Scalable Video Streaming,”Proc. of IEEE Globecom 2010 Workshop on Network of the Future, Miami,FL, USA, pp. 351356 (2010). doi: 10. 1109/GLOCOMW.2010.5700340
  3. [3] Egilmez, H. E., Gorkemli, B., Tekalp, A. M. and Civanlar, S., “Scalable Video Streaming Over OpenFlow Networks: an Optimization Framework for QoS Routing,” Proc. of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Brussels, Belgium, September 1114, pp. 22412244 (2011). doi: 10.1109/ ICIP.2011.6116083
  4. [4] Egilmez,H. E., Civanlar, S. and Tekalp, A. M.,“ADistributed QoS Routing Architecture for Scalable Video Streaming Over Multi-domain OpenFlow Networks,” Proc. of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Orlando, FL, USA, September 30 October 3, pp. 22372240 (2012). doi: 10.1109/ICIP. 2012.6467340
  5. [5] Egilmez, H. E., Civanlar, S. and Tekalp, A. M., “An Optimization Framework for QoS-Enabled Adaptive Video Streaming Over OpenFlow Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 710 715 (2013). doi: 10.1109/TMM.2012.2232645
  6. [6] Egilmez, H. E. and Tekalp, A. M., “Distributed QoS Architectures for Multimedia Streaming Over Software Defined Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 15971609 (2014). doi: 10. 1109/TMM.2014.2325791
  7. [7] Laga, S., Van Cleemput, T., Van Raemdonck, F., Vanhoutte, F., Bouten, N., Claeys, M. and De Turck, F., “Optimizing Scalable Video Delivery through Open Flow Layer-based Routing,” Proc. of 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, Krakow, Poland, May 59, pp. 14 (2014). doi: 10.1109/ NOMS.2014.6838378
  8. [8] Xue, N.,Chen,X.,Gong, L.,Li,S.,Hu, D.andZhu, Z., “Demonstration of Openflow-controlled Network Orchestration for Adaptive SVC Video Manycast,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 1617 1629 (2015). doi: 10.1109/TMM.2015.2450014
  9. [9] Gangwal, A., Gupta, M., Gaur, M. S., Laxmi, V. and Conti, M., “ELBA: Efficient Layer Based Routing AlgorithminSDN,” Proc. ofInternationalConference on Computer Communication and Networks, Waikoloa, HI, USA, August 14 (2016). doi: 10.1109/ICCCN. 2016.7568515
  10. [10] Schwarz, H., Marpe, D. and Wiegand, T., “Overview of the Scalable Video Coding Extension of the H.264/ AVC Standard,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 11031120 (2007). doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2007.905532
  11. [11] Yu, Y. S. and Ke, C. H., “Genetic Algorithm-based Routing Method for Enhanced Video Delivery Over Software Defined Networks,” International Journal of Communication Systems, Version of Record online: 2 Aug 2017. doi: 10.1002/dac.3391
  12. [12] Egilmez,H.E.,Dane,S.T.,Bagci,K.T.andTekalp,A. M., “OpenQoS: an Openflow Controller Design for Multimedia Delivery with End-to-end Quality of Service Over Software Defined Networks,” Proc. of Signal & Information Processing Association Annual Summitand Conference, Hollywood, CA, USA, December 36, pp. 18 (2012).
  13. [13] Nam, H., Kim, K. H., Kim, J. Y. and Schulzrinne, H., “Towards QoE-aware Video Streaming using SDN,” Proc. of IEEE 2014 Global Communications Conference, Austin, TX, USA, December 812, pp. 1317 1322 (2014). doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7036990
  14. [14] Ke, C. H., Chen, Y. S. and Yu, Y. S., “Improving Video Transmission in Software Defined Wired and Wireless Networks using Multi-path Transmission,” Journal of Communications and Networks, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 587595 (2017).