Jie Zhang1, Xiaobing Wu2, Hongwei Guo1, and Tao Wu3
1School of Automobile, Zhejiang Institute of Communications, Hangzhou 311112, China
2Zhejiang Technology Innovation Service Center, Hangzhou 310007, China
3School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
Received: May 13, 2026
Accepted: August 01, 2026
Publication Date: August 12, 2026
Schematic diagram of energy flow topology of the test vehicle
Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.
Download Citation: BibTeX | http://dx.doi.org/10.6180/jase.202611_34.036
During vehicle operation, the initial state of charge (ISOC) of the onboard battery affects the control strategies governing battery and generator operation, which in turn influences the vehicle’ s energy distribution. In this study, an SUV equipped with an intelligent start-stop system and braking energy recovery was tested on a chassis dynamometer under the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test cycle (WLTC) to investigate the effects of three battery ISOC levels– 45%, 70% (battery threshold), and 85%– on vehicle energy distribution. The results show that ISOC exerts a significant influence on battery and generator operation, thereby affecting energy recovery efficiency. A battery ISOC of 85% favors improved vehicle energy efficiency and reduced fuel consumption. Conversely, at an ISOC of 45%, the vehicle exhibits the highest fuel consumption, an increase of more than 8%, indicating that operation with an ISOC substantially below the threshold should be avoided. This study develops a practical experimental method that links the easily measurable ISOC parameter to holistic vehicle energy performance, offering a novel and efficient approach to indirectly evaluate how gradual battery degradation affects vehicle fuel economy without the need for long-term aging tests.
Keywords: initial state of charge; battery; energy distribution; energy recovery; WLTC
- [1] A. K. Agarwal, C. Mounaïm-Rousselle, P. Brequigny, A. Dhar, C. Hespel, C. Patel, D. K. Srivastava, G. Duraisamy, L. Le Moyne, N. Sharma, N. Labhasetwar, P. Singh, P. Das, P. K. Panigrahi, P. C. Shukla, P. Sakthivel, S. Mohan, S. Panigrahy, S. Sen, and H. Valera, (2025) “Future of internal combustion engines using sustainable, scalable, and storable E-fuels and biofuels for decarbonizing transport and enabling advanced combustion technologies” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 110: 101236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2025.101236.
- [2] A. O. Ali, O. Abdelrehim, M. M. Saafan, M. R. Elmarghany, and A. M. Hamed, (2025) “Comprehensive review of battery management systems for electric vehicles: Thermal management, charging strategies, and emerging technologies” Journal of Power Sources 658: 238269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.238269.
- [3] P. Shrivastava, P. A. Naidu, S. Sharma, B. K. Panigrahi, and A. Garg, (2023) “Review on technological advancement of lithium-ion battery states estimation methods for electric vehicle applications” Journal of Energy Storage 64: 107159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107159.
- [4] C. Huang, Q. Shi, W. Ding, E. Q. Wu, and P. Mei, (2025) “A Multirate-Fused State-of-Charge Estimation Scheme of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles With Energy Harvesting Sensors” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 74: 1–11. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2025.3547129.
- [5] R. Guo and W. Shen, (2023) “Lithium-Ion Battery State of Charge and State of Power Estimation Based on a Partial-Adaptive Fractional-Order Model in Electric Vehicles” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 70(10): 10123–10133. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3220881.
- [6] Q. Wang, C. Sun, and Y. Gu, (2023) “Research on SOC estimation method of hybrid electric vehicles battery based on the grey wolf optimized particle filter” Computers and Electrical Engineering 110: 108907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108907.
- [7] X. Lü, S. Li, X. He, C. Xie, S. He, Y. Xu, J. Fang, M. Zhang, and X. Yang, (2022) “Hybrid electric vehicles: A review of energy management strategies based on model predictive control” Journal of Energy Storage 56: 106112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106112.
- [8] J. J. Jui, M. A. Ahmad, M. I. Molla, and M. I. M. Rashid, (2024) “Optimal energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicles: A recent survey of machine learning approaches” Journal of Engineering Research 12(3): 454–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.016.
- [9] I. Jarraya, F. Masmoudi, M. H. Chabchoub, and H. Trabelsi, (2019) “An online state of charge estimation for Lithium-ion and supercapacitor in hybrid electric drive vehicle” Journal of Energy Storage 26: 100946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100946.
- [10] X. Zhao, L. Wang, Y. Zhou, B. Pan, R. Wang, L. Wang, and X. Yan, (2022) “Energy management strategies for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles: Classification, comparison, and outlook” Energy Conversion and Management 270: 116179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116179.
- [11] A. S. Mohammed, S. M. Atnaw, A. O. Salau, and J. N. Eneh, (2023) “Review of optimal sizing and power management strategies for fuel cell/battery/super capacitor hybrid electric vehicles” Energy Reports 9: 2213–2228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.042.
- [12] C. P. Sahwal, S. Sengupta, and T. Q. Dinh, (2024) “Advanced Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy for Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Vehicles” Journal of Cleaner Production 437: 140366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140366.
- [13] A. A. Mahajan and N. P. Mungle, (2025) “Fuzzy Logic Based Power Distribution Strategy for Hybrid Fuel Cell Vehicle” Metallurgical and Materials Engineering 31(3): 358–367. DOI: 10.63278/1385.
- [14] M. Averbukh, B. Rivin, and J. Vinogradov. “On-Board Battery Condition Diagnostics Based on Mathematical Modeling of an Engine Starting System”. In: SAE World Congress & Exhibition. SAE International, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-1476.
- [15] C. Armenta-Déu, (2024) “Battery Management for Improved Performance in Hybrid Electric Vehicles” Vehicles 6(2): 949–966. DOI: 10.3390/vehicles6020045.
- [16] R. R. Kumar, C. Bharatiraja, K. Udhayakumar, S. Devakirubakaran, K. S. Sekar, and L. Mihet-Popa, (2023) “Advances in Batteries, Battery Modeling, Battery Management System, Battery Thermal Management, SOC, SOH, and Charge/Discharge Characteristics in EV Applications” IEEE Access 11: 105761–105809. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3318121.
- [17] G. Vuylsteke, H. Wu, W. Moore, and D. Washington. “Impact of Battery Aging on the State of Charge-Open Circuit Voltage Relationship and Its Effects on Battery Capacity Estimation”. In: WCX SAE World Congress Experience. SAE International, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8558.
- [18] V. Duong, T. Thâm, W. Choi, and D.-W. Kim, (2016) “State Estimation Technique for VRLA Batteries for Automotive Applications” Journal of Power Electronics 16: 238–248. DOI: 10.6113/JPE.2016.16.1.238.
- [19] J. Wishart, M. Shirk, T. Gray, and N. Fengler. “Quantifying the Effects of Idle-Stop Systems on Fuel Economy in Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles”. In: SAE 2012 World Congress & Exhibition. SAE International, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0719.
- [20] M. Debbou and F. Colet. “Inductive wireless power transfer for electric vehicle dynamic charging”. In: 2016 IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies: Wireless Power Transfer (WoW). 2016, 118–122. DOI: 10.1109/WoW.2016.7772077.
- [21] C. Bharatiraja and G. Ramanathan. “A Hybridization of Photovoltaic and Battery Sources with Dual Input-Dual Output Converter for EV Charger”. In: Smart Grid Stability and Control. Ed. by R. Krishan, D. R. Pullaguram, and S. R. Salkuti. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2025, 263–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8634-3_18.
- [22] M. Wang and T. Huang. “An Integrated Electric Energy Management System to Improve Fuel Economy”. In: Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, 115–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33829-8_12.
- [23] K. W. E. Cheng, B. P. Divakar, H. Wu, K. Ding, and H. F. Ho, (2011) “Battery-Management System (BMS) and SOC Development for Electrical Vehicles” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 60: 76–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2010.2089647.
- [24] S. Kim, K. Kim, J. Ha, S. Kwon, and Y. Seo, (2016) “A Study about Impact of Battery SOC on Fuel Economy of Conventional Diesel Vehicle” Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 24: 480–486. DOI: 10.7467/KSAE.2016.24.4.480.
- [25] I. Cho and J. Lee, (2020) “Characteristics of Battery SOC According to Drive Output and Battery Capacity of Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle” Applied Sciences 10(8): DOI: 10.3390/app10082833.
- [26] P. Ruetschi, (2004) “Aging mechanisms and service life of lead–acid batteries” Journal of Power Sources 127(1): 33–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.052.
- [27] S. Singirikonda and Y. P. Obulesu. “Advanced SOC and SOH Estimation Methods for EV Batteries—A Review”. In: Advances in Automation, Signal Processing, Instrumentation, and Control. Ed. by V. L. N. Komanapalli, N. Sivakumaran, and S. Hampannavar. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2021, 1963–1977.
- [28] Y. Wang, J. Tian, Z. Sun, L. Wang, R. Xu, M. Li, and Z. Chen, (2020) “A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 131: 110015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110015.
- [29] J. S. Kim, J. W. Kim, J. H. Jeong, S. C. Jeong, and J. W. Lee, (2016) “Effects of Initial SOC of 270-Volt Battery on Operating Performance of Gasoline Engine and Electric motor in a Parallel Hybrid Vehicle under IM240 Driving Cycle Mode” Advances in Automobile Engineering 2016: 1–9. DOI: 10.4172/2167-7670.S1-008.
- [30] United Nations. Global technical regulation on worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure. Tech. rep. ECE/TRANS/180/Add.15. Global Technical Regulation No. 15 (GTR 15) on Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP), established in the Global Registry on 15 November 2017. United Nations, 2017.
