Hung-Yin Tsai This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Chia-Jen Ting2,3, Kei-Lin Kuo4 and Chang-Pin Chou3

1Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan 202, R.O.C.
2Micro and Nano Optical Film Technology Department, Mechanical and System Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan 310, R.O.C.
3Mechanical Engineering Department, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 300, R.O.C.
4Department of Vehicle Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 106, R.O.C.


 

Received: February 12, 2007
Accepted: April 8, 2007
Publication Date: June 1, 2007

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2007.10.2.05  


ABSTRACT


Antireflection structured surface was analyzed by a finite difference time domain (FDTD) method in the visible light spectrum. The antireflection structured array was conical moth-eye structures. Comparing the reflectance of different aspect ratios by the FDTD method, we found that the reflectance was less than 1% when the aspect ratio was larger than 0.8 in the visible light spectrum. In order to confirm the results by this simulation method, the conical structured arrays of a polymer film were fabricated by the holographic lithography and a following replicating process. The conical structured arrays were fabricated with the periodic length of 350 nm and the height of 300 nm. The simulation results by FDTD method were compared with those by the fabricated sub-wavelength structures. The experimental results showed highly consistent with the simulation results.


Keywords: Finite Difference Time Domain, Antireflection, Sub-Wavelength Structured Array


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Michael Niggemann, et al., “Periodic Microstructures for Large Area Applications Generated by Holography,” SPIE, Vol. 4438, pp. 108115 (2001).
  2. [2] Toyota, H., et al., “Design and Fabrication of Guidedmode Resonant Grating Filter with Antireflection Structured Surface,” SPIE Vol. 5184, pp. 8998 (2003).
  3. [3] Boerner, V., et al., “Holographic Antiglare and Antireflection Films for Flat Panel Displays,” SID 03 Digest, pp. 6871 (2003).
  4. [4] Yang, Zhenyu, et al., “The Study of a Nano-Porous Optical Film with the Finite Difference Time Domain Method,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. Vol. 6, pp. 564 568 (2004).
  5. [5] Li, Y., Kanamori, Y. and Hane, K., “A New Method for Fabrication Nano-Porous Aluminum Grating Array,” Microsystem Technologies. Vol. 10, pp. 272274 (2004).
  6. [6] Ulrike Schulz, “Review of Modern Techniques to Generate Antireflective Properties on Thermoplastic Polymers,” Apl. Opt. Vol. 45, pp. 16081618 (2006).
  7. [7] Bernhard, C. G., “Structural and Functional Adaptation in a Visual System,” Endeavour, Vol. 26, pp. 79 84 (1967).
  8. [8] Gaylord, Thomas K., et al., “Zero-Reflectivity High Spatial-Frequency Rectangular-Groove Dielectric Surface-Relief Gratings,” Appl. Opt. Vol. 25, pp. 209214 (1986).
  9. [9] Yuzo Ono, et al., “Antireflection Effect in Ultrahigh Spatial-Frequency Holographic Relief Gratings,” Appl. Opt., Vol. 26, pp. 11421146 (1987).
  10. [10] Motamedi, M. E., et al., “Antireflection Surfaces in Silicon Using Binary Optics Technology,” Appl. Opt. Vol. 31, pp. 225229 (1992).
  11. [11] Raguin, D. H. and Morris, G. M., “Antireflection Structured Surfaces for the Infrared Spectral Region,” Appl. Opt. Vol. 32, pp. 11541167 (1993).
  12. [12] Berenger, J. P., “Perfectly Matched Layer for the FDTD Solution of Wave-Structure Interaction Problems,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. Vol. 44, pp. 110117 (1996).