Yuhua Peng This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1, Wenli Xu1, and Yan Xiong1
1Wuchang University of Technology Artificial Intelligence School, Wuhan, Hubei, 430223, China
Received: February 2, 2021 Accepted: March 4, 2021 Publication Date: August 1, 2021
Copyright The Author's institute. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.
IoT has helped to understand the full range of internet apps used in different manufacturing and hypothetical fields. It is possible by contributing people to an unparalleled level of ease and enjoyment. In Addition to this, recent research in computer and communication technologies has provided an entire group of convenience and comfortable and enjoyable. It will stretch the entire entree to the information about the physical ecosphere and the object that has to explain the complete innovation services to increase efficiency and productivity. The total populace for the research drive is recognized as the 150 persons from diverse age groups and backgrounds—the data gathering procedure underway in September 2019. For exploring the critical level of dependents and independents, the Variable’s adequate sample scope required. The benefit of supporting the IoT usage with the infrastructure and individuals and other persons toward the IoT will help to understand the sustainable use of IoT. This research study objective to measure the issues influence the sustainability of IoT. The overall results represent the significant relationship between them. Social influences, performance expectancy describe the positive relation and many connections with the sustainability usage of IoT.
Keywords: IOT, Data mining, Data Compression, sustainable, facilitating conditions, Social influence.
REFERENCES
[1] Ateev Agarwal, Eesh Mehandiratta, Rohit Sanket, Rohit Samkaria, Tanisha Gupta, Rajesh Singh, and Anita Gehlot. Smart door lock system for elderly, Hand icapped people living alone. International Journal of Smart Home, 10(6):155–162, 2016.
[2] Faustino Alarcón, David Perez, and Andrés Boza. Using the internet of things in a production planning context. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(1):72, 2016.
[3] Debasis Bandyopadhyay and Jaydip Sen. Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 58(1):49–69, 2011.
[4] Thierry Bodhuin, Gerardo Canfora, Rosa Preziosi, and Maria Tortorella. Hiding complexity and heterogeneity of the physical world in smart living environments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2:1921–1927, 2006.
[5] Liming Chen, Chris Nugent, Maurice Mulvenna, Dewar Finlay, and Xin Hong. Semantic smart homes: Towards knowledge rich assisted living environments. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 189:279–296, 2009.
[6] Scott Davidoff, Min Kyung Lee, Charles Yiu, John Zimmerman, and Anind K. Dey. Principles of smart home control. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4206 LNCS:19–34, 2006.
[7] A. Dohr, R. Modre-Osprian, M. Drobics, D. Hayn, and G. Schreier. The internet of things for ambient assisted living. ITNG2010 - 7th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pages 804–809, 2010.
[8] Amir Hosein GhaffarianHoseini, Nur Dalilah Dahlan, Umberto Berardi, Ali GhaffarianHoseini, and Nastaran Makaremi. The essence of future smart houses: From embedding ICT to adapting to sustainability principles Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24:593–607, 2013.
[9] Rolf H Weber. Internet of Things - New security and privacy challenges. Computer Law and Security Review, 26(1):23–30, 2010.
[10] Chin Teng Lin, Fu Chang Lin, Shi An Chen, Shao Wei Lu, Te Chi Chen, and Li Wei Ko. EEG-based braincomputer interface for smart living environmental autoadjustment. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 30(4):237–245, 2010.
[11] Daniele Miorandi, Sabrina Sicari, Francesco De Pellegrini, and Imrich Chlamtac. Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7):1497–1516, 2012.
[12] Sherry Turkle. Technology and human vulnerability. A conversation with MIT’s Sherry Turkle. Harvard business review, 81(9):43–50, 131, 2003.
[13] Lorna Uden and Wu He. How the Internet of Things can help knowledge management: a case study from the automotive domain. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1):57–70, 2017.
[14] Michael D. Williams, Nripendra P. Rana, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3):443–448, apr 2015.
[15] Li Da Xu, Wu He, and Shancang Li. Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(4):2233–2243, 2014.
[16] Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf, F Ajesh, A. A. Hamad, Gia Nhu Nguyen, and Dac Nhuong Le. Efficient DualCooperative Bait Detection Scheme for Collaborative Attackers on Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. IEEE Access, 2020.
We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.
