Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

1.60

CiteScore

R. GEETHA1This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and K. SATHIYANATHAN2

1Department of Mathematics, CSI College of Engineering, Ketti, Ooty, The Nilgiris-643215, Tamilnadu, India.

2Department of Mathematics, SRMV College of Arts and Science, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641020, Tamilnadu, India.


Received: May 2, 2023
Accepted: August 3, 2023
Publication Date: November 4, 2023

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202407_27(7).0003  


This article focuses on the study of active group defense in prey, where they defend themselves against attacking predators as a group. The aim of this paper is to create a mathematical model to examine the functional response resulting from active group defense. The model integrates a mechanism involving the joining and separation of prey individuals in response to attacks. The formation of defense clusters occurs as a result, with the attacking predator acting as the central point of cohesion. The study also takes into account the metabolic costs of defense, which can reduce the growth rate of the prey population. The study also investigates the conditions under which the prey can successfully defend itself against the predator and how this affects the stability of the system. Overall, this study provides a deeper understanding of the relationships between predators and prey, and the factors that influence their dynamics. Conventional predator-prey research often overlooks the dynamic coagulation and fragmentation processes involved in collective prey defense. This novel study introduces a unique perspective, shedding light on how prey species unite against predators. The manuscript’s originality lies in its exploration of coagulation and fragmentation as crucial to unraveling prey defense strategies. A mathematical model is introduced, delving into these processes and unveiling an unexplored facet of predatorprey interactions. The findings enhance our understanding of collaborative prey defense mechanisms and hold broader applications, amplifying the significance of this research.


Keywords: Defense mechanism, coagulation, fragmentation, clusters, Geritz and Gyllenberg model.


  1. [1] M. C. Köhnke, (2019) “Invasion Dynamics in an Intraguild Predation System with Predator-Induced Defense" Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 81: 3754–3777.
  2. [2] S. Y. C. Xu and T. Zhang, (2016) “Global dynamics of a predator-prey model with defense mechanism for prey" Appl. Math. Lett. 62: DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2016.06.013.
  3. [3] M. Kondoh, (2007) “Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food webs" Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274(1618): DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0335.
  4. [4] M. C. Köhnke, I. Siekmann, and H. Malchow, (2020) “Taxis-driven pattern formation in a predator-prey model with group defense" Ecological Complexity 43: 100848. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100848.
  5. [5] I. G. J. P. Mendona and M. L. Lyra, (2020) “Prey refuge and morphological defense mechanisms as nonlinear triggers in an intraguild predation food web" Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 90: DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105373.
  6. [6] E. C. Haskell and J. Bell, (2021) “Bifurcation analysis for a one predator and two prey model with preytaxis" Journal of Biological Systems: DOI: 10.1142/S0218339021400131.
  7. [7] A. Gupta and B. Dubey, (2022) “Bifurcation analysis of a Leslie-Gower prey-predator model with fear and cooperative hunting" Springer Proceedings in Complexity: DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99792-2_90.
  8. [8] V. Kumar and N. Kumari, (2021) “Bifurcation study and pattern formation analysis of a tritrophic food chain model with group defense and Ivlev-like nonmonotonic functional response" Chaos Solitons Fractals 147: DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110964.
  9. [9] C. C. S. Djilali and L. N. Guin, (2021) “Delayed predator-prey model with prey social behavior" Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136(9): DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01940-9.
  10. [10] Z. I. A. Manaf and M. H. Mohd, (2022) “Dynamical system analysis of the preypredator interactions involving prey refuge and herd behaviors in preys" Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 18(1): DOI: 10.11113/MJFAS.V18N1.2415.
  11. [11] K. E. Ingeman and M. Novak, (2022) “Effects of predator novelty on intraguild predation communities with adaptive prey defense" Theor. Ecol. 15(2): DOI: 10.1007/s12080-022-00534-0.
  12. [12] C. Xu, S. Yuan, and T. Zhang, (2016) “Global dynamics of a predator–prey model with defense mechanism for prey" Applied Mathematics Letters 62: 42–48. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2016.06.013


    



 

1.6
2022CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.