Hung Bui Duc1 and Vuong Dang QuocThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1
1School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Viet Nam
Received: July 23, 2021 Accepted: February 19, 2022 Publication Date: March 19, 2022
Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.
The idea of this search is to improve the errors on magnetic fields, eddy currents and joule power loss densities appearing from shielding models via an iterative perturbation technique. The inaccuracy of shielding solutions obtained from a simplified mesh is corrected by volume improvements covering the actual volume thin regions. In the subproblem strategy, instead of using a full model (problem) in a full mesh, the problem will be split into sub-models (some of them being thin region) with lower dimensions, where the solution of each sub-model is influenced by all the others. Hence, an iterative process between the sub-models is proposed to get an exact solution.
[1] H. Tsuboi, T. Asahara, F. Kobayashi, and T. Misaki, (1997) “Eddy current analysis on thin conducting plate by an integral equation method using edge elements" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 33(2): 1346–1349. DOI: 10.1109/20.582505.
[2] C. Geuzaine, P. Dular, andW. Legros, (2000) “Dual formulations for the modeling of thin electromagnetic shells using edge elements" IEEE transactions on Magnetics 36(4): 799–803. DOI: 10.1109/20.877566.
[3] P. Dular, L. Krahenbuhl, R. V. Sabariego, M. V. Ferreira da Luz, P. Kuo-Peng, and C. Geuzaine, (2012) “A Finite Element Subproblem Method for Position Change Conductor Systems" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 48(2): 403–406. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2011.2176924.
[4] V. Q. Dang, P. Dular, R. V. Sabariego, L. Krahenbuhl, and C. Geuzaine, (2012) “Subproblem Approach for Thin Shell Dual Finite Element Formulations" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 48(2): 407–410. DOI: 10. 1109/TMAG.2011.2176925.
[5] P. Dular, V. Q. Dang, R. V. Sabariego, L. Kahenbuhl, and C. Geuzaine, (2011) “Correction of Thin Shell Finite Element Magnetic Models via a Subproblem Method" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 47(5): 1158–1161. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2076794.
[6] P. Dular and R. V. Sabariego, (2007) “A Perturbation Method for Computing Field Distortions Due to Conductive Regions With h-Conform Magnetodynamic Finite Element Formulations" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 43(4): 1293–1296. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2007.892401.
[7] P. Dular, R. V. Sabariego, M. V. Ferreira da Luz, P. Kuo-Peng, and L. Krahenbuhl, (2009) “Perturbation Finite Element Method for Magnetic Model Refinement of Air Gaps and Leakage Fluxes" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 45(3): 1400–1403. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG. 2009.2012643.
[8] Q. N. D. Vuong Dang Quoc, (2020) “A Perturbation Finite Element Approach for Correcting Inaccuracies on Thin Shell Models with the Magnetic Field Formulation" Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 5(3): 166–170. DOI: 10.25046/ aj050322.
[9] C. Geuzaine, B. Meys, F. Henrotte, P. Dular, and W. Legros, (1999) “A Galerkin projection method for mixed finite elements" IEEE transactions on magnetics 35(3): 1438–1441.
[10] C. Geuzaine, B. Meys, F. Henrotte, P. Dular, and W. Legros, (1999) “A Galerkin projection method for mixed finite elements" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 35(3): 1438–1441. DOI: 10.1109/20.767236.
[11] A. Vion, R. V. Sabariego, and C. Geuzaine, (2011) “A Model Reduction Algorithm for Solving Multiple Scattering Problems Using Iterative Methods" IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 47(5): 1470–1473. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2078800.
We use cookies on this website to personalize content to improve your user experience and analyze our traffic. By using this site you agree to its use of cookies.
